Maharashtra's former chief minister Uddhav Thackeray Monday approached the Delhi high court seeking the quashing of the Election Commission of India (ECI) order freezing the party name Shiv Sena and its election symbol ’bow and arrow'.
The petition, filed by Thackeray, has challenged the ECI's October 8 order, contending that it was passed in complete violation of the principles of natural justice and without granting any hearing to the parties and giving them an opportunity to lead evidence.
The ECI, by its October 8 interim order, barred the two Shiv Sena factions led by Uddhav Thackeray and Chief Minister Eknath Shinde from using the party name and its election symbol in the Andheri East assembly bypoll.
In the interim order passed following contesting claims made by the rival factions about majority support in the Shiv Sena's legislative and organisational wings, the commission had asked them to suggest by Monday three different name choices and also three free symbols for allocation to their respective groups.
The interim order had come on the Shinde faction's request seeking the allotment of the bow and arrow symbol as the Andheri East assembly bypoll was approaching.
Thackeray's petition, which has arraigned the ECI and Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde as parties, sought quashing of the ECI order and, in the alternative, sought directions to consider and allot the symbol proposed by Thackeray without restricting the choice of symbol from the list of free symbols notified by the commission.
”Since bye-elections have been notified in the state of Maharashtra for 166-Andheri East constituency for which the last date of nominations is October 14, 2022, and the date of poll is November 3, grave prejudice will be caused to the petitioner (Thackeray) and his party if the impugned order is not stayed,” the plea said.
Giving examples of the dispute relating to the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam's ’two leaves' election symbol and similar wranglings in the Janata Dal-United and the Samajwadi Party, it said in all these cases, the order freezing or refusing to freeze the symbol was passed by the ECI only after hearing the parties.
The petition said in this case, without affording an opportunity to be heard despite an application of the petitioner requesting oral hearing, the ECI displayed undue haste and passed the order freezing the symbol of ‘bow and arrow' of the political party Shiv Sena led by Uddhav Thackeray, which symbol is intrinsically identified with it, having been used by it since the inception of the party in 1966.
The plea said it was pertinent to note here that the said symbol was developed, designed and copyrighted by the late Balasaheb Thackeray, and claimed that the freezing of the symbol is actuated by malice in law and is erroneous as the preliminary reply filed by the petitioner before ECI clearly shows the petition there was not maintainable at the behest of Shinde.
”Respondent no. 2 (Shinde) himself admits and accepts that the petitioner has been elected as the president (Shivsena paksha pramukh) and that the petitioner till date continues to occupy the post of the president of Shiv Sena, and that under the Constitution of Shiv Sena, it is the president who is the highest authority in the party, whose decisions in all matters concerning the party policy and party administration are final,” it said.
The plea said the idea of a symbol is reflective of the ideologies, ethos, and principles of a political party, in this case the Shiv Sena political party, and is an appropriate vehicle to demonstrate the aspirations and values of the political party.
”It is further submitted that the only restriction which can be imposed while making the choice of an election symbol is that such symbol should not have been allotted to any other political party and such proposed symbol is even otherwise within the permitted guidelines.
”In the instant case, restricting the petitioner from selecting a symbol from a limited list of symbols strikes at the very root of the entitlement of the petitioner to choose or propose a symbol of his own choice,” it said.
It added that to assert his right to propose a symbol other than from the list of free symbols, Thackeray -- under protest and without prejudice to his right to challenge the impugned order freezing the symbol ’bow and arrow' -- has proposed three symbols of his own choice (which do not find a place in the list of free symbols) in the order of preference.
He sought the court's indulgence for a suitable direction to the ECI to consider and allot the first preference if available, and if not, then the second preference, and similarly, if the same is not available, then third preference indicated by him.
The Thackeray faction has proposed three election symbols for itself in the Andheri East bypoll, including trident (trishul), the rising sun and flaming torch (mashaal).
Shinde had raised a banner of revolt against Thackeray, accusing him of entering into an "unnatural alliance" with the Congress and Nationalist Congress Party. Over 40 of the Shiv Sena's 55 MLAs had supported Shinde, forcing the resignation of Thackeray from the post of Maharashtra chief minister.
Twelve of the 18 Lok Sabha members of the Shiv Sena also came out in support of Shinde, who later claimed to be the leader of the original Shiv Sena.
The Andheri East bypoll is the first after Shinde and the BJP unseated the Maha Vikas Aghadi government in June, and is considered by political analysts as a precursor to settling of claims by Shinde and Thackeray to be the "real" Shiv Sena.
