Journalist and author Chitra Subramaniam has asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to make public its discoveries from the 'box of evidence' received from Switzerland on Bofors payoffs which, the former officers said, were used in the probe and submitted before the court as evidence in its charge sheet.
In an exclusive interview with PTI, the author of Boforsgate: A Journalist's Pursuit of Truth said, "We should be told who opened the box, when it was opened, what was in the boxes."
She also wondered if the commission in the deal was 18 percent, as suggested by the evidence Swedish firm Bofors gave to the Indian government.
"Secondly, why would George Fernandez, who was then the defence minister, tell me at the end of 1999 that he was told by Brijesh Mishra not to open the box?"
Subramaniam, who has remained firm in her stance on the issue, said, "The CBI is saying what it has to say. I have to say what I have to say."
Former director general of Rajasthan police, OP Galhotra, who played an important role in the Bofors case during his tenure with the CBI, said the agency filed a charge sheet based on documents received from Switzerland.
"It is crucial to understand that these documents were transferred from a Swiss court to an Indian court, with the boxes opened at the direction of the designated court," he said in a reply to questions from PTI.
"The boxes were opened, and everything was examined. Indeed, the documents were crucial and critical that prompted the agency to file a supplementary charge sheet."
While declining to engage in discussions regarding the author of a recent book on the subject, the 1985-batch IPS officer, who served in the CBI from 1996 to 2004 and later from 2008 to 2015, affirmed that investigators are accountable to the courts. "A charge sheet is submitted in court and is considered a public document."
The Bofors documents were transferred to India by a three-member team, led by the ex-CBI director Joginder Singh, and were submitted to additional sessions judge Ajit Bharihoke at the Tis Hazari complex.
The claims in Subramaniam's book have not been independently verified.
She questioned the official narrative regarding the alleged bribe in the Bofors case, suggesting the sum of Rs 64 crore may not reflect the full extent of the corruption.
"I don't believe, nobody believes that 18.5 percent was not paid. We're going around saying 64 crore, 64 crore, 64 crore. What is the real percentage? Because Sten Lindstrom (former head of Swedish police) doesn't believe it was 3 percent. Why would such a large democracy stand on its head for so little money?" she said.
Subramaniam said that the CBI planted stories about Hindi film actor Amitabh Bachchan to derail the investigation and launched a political vendetta against the Bachchans.
She recalled that Bachchan had come to her home and asked if she had seen his name.
"They tried to derail the investigation in a massive way. And then we found out there was absolutely nothing on the Bachchans," Subramaniam said.
"He is a star by himself. He needs neither political patronage nor money. They were trying to bring him down. All governments were trying to bring him down, from Rajiv Gandhi to V P Singh. And you know, I think people are just jealous of this man. He doesn't need anyone," she said.
When asked about possible links between the Bofors scandal and the Gandhi family, Subramaniam said she was not sure about Rajiv Gandhi, but the money reached Italian businessman Ottavio Quattrocchi.
"I know it reached Mr Quattrocchi. First, there was a bank in Zurich, the Nord Finance Bank, and then from there, it touched the money. And then it went to Geneva. And then his wife came into the account," she said.
Regarding the CBI's recent request for assistance from the United States, Subramaniam said, "And now I'm reading in some papers that there is a Letter of Rogatory (LR) that's going to the United States. Why not Sweden? After all, this is the biggest investigation. I find it strange that the Indian investigators don't want to connect with Swedish investigators. Why?"
On Wednesday, officials said that the CBI had sent a judicial request to the US seeking information from private investigator Michael Hershman, who had expressed willingness to share with Indian agencies crucial details about the Rs 64-crore Bofors bribery scandal from the 1980s.
Hershman, head of the Fairfax Group, visited India in 2017 to attend a conference of private detectives.
During his stay, he appeared on various platforms, alleging that the investigation into the scam had been derailed by the then Congress government and stated he was willing to share details with the CBI.
He claimed in an interview that he was appointed by the Union finance ministry in 1986 for investigation of violation of currency control laws and money laundering by Indians abroad and tracking of such assets outside India, and some of them pertained to the Bofors deal.
The agency took note of Hershman's claims in several interviews and announced in 2017 that the matter would be investigated according to due process.
The need for Letters Rogatory arose because letters and reminders to the US authorities on November 8, 2023, December 21, 2023, May 13, 2024, and August 14, 2024, did not yield any information.
Subramaniam's book delves into the Bofors scandal, a major bribery case involving the Indian government and the Swedish arms manufacturer Bofors in the 1980s. The scam pertains to allegations of a Rs 64-crore bribe in a Rs 1,437-crore deal with Bofors for the supply of 400 155mm field Howitzers, which played a significant role in India's victory during the Kargil war.
The CBI filed the charge sheets in 1999 and 2000.
The Delhi high court exonerated Rajiv Gandhi in 2004, nearly 13 years after he was assassinated by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam in a suicide attack.
In 2005, the Delhi high court quashed all charges against the remaining accused, noting that the CBI failed to prove that the money transferred by Bofors to various agents by Italian businessman Ottavio Quattrocchi was meant to be paid as a bribe to public servants in India.
The CBI appealed against the 2005 decision in the apex court in 2018, but it was dismissed on the grounds of delay.
The Supreme Court, however, allowed it to raise all the points in an appeal filed by advocate Ajay Aggarwal in 2005.
© 2025