The Pudukottai verdict is a sobering message for Karunanidhi
N Sathiya Moorthy in Madras
The demoralised AIADMK cadres feel re-energised, the ruling DMK
feels subdued in victory, but it is the smaller
parties like the Tamil Maanila Congress, Marumalarchi Dravida
Munnetra Kazhagam and the CPI-M that sent out a message
in last week's Pudukottai by-election in Tamil Nadu.
The ruling DMK retained the assembly seat by a fourth of its
victory margin in last year's
election, sending out a clear signal about the people's
decision to vote on the incumbent-government's performance than
the misdeeds of its predecessor.
The lack of voter-interest in the by-poll coming soon after the general
election and local bodies poll, and
the conclusion that the DMK would easily retain its seat,
may be some of the reasons for the party's low victory
margin.
DMK cadres, however, blame the TMC for the party's "poor
showing.'' They feel TMC cadres settled scores with the DMK for
the manner in which the ruling party in Tamil Nadu virtually ignored its ally
in distributing seats for the the local bodies poll.
What upped the stakes for the DMK, thus making its victory margin
look small, was the party's determination to keep AIADMK supremo
and former chief minister Jayalalitha Jayaram at the centre of
the electoral battle in Pudukottai.
DMK supremo and Chief Minister
M Karunanidhi publicly declared that the by-poll was a referendum on
his government's actions against Jayalalitha and
her aides for their alleged corruption.
A bigger margin than the 43,000 votes scored by A Periannan, whose death had caused
the by-election, would be proof thereof, Karunanidhi had contended.
That being the case, the much-reduced victory margin of 12,024
votes recorded by DMK nominee P Mari Ayya has helped the AIADMK
to argue that the the electorate has disapproved of the
government's actions against Jayalalitha.
As is only to be expected, AIADMK leaders have now started referring
to Jayalalitha's hospitalisation during the campaign, but
for which, they claim, the party could have won the seat. Not
many are willing to accept the role played by the
party's deputy general secretary and former minister S Thirunavukkarasu,
who belongs to the district.
Thirunavukkarasu, who has changed his political loyalties several times
in recent years, has retained the neighbouring Arantagi seat, sailing
against the prevailing political wind in the last three elections.
No one is willing to give Thirunavukkarasu and his band of loyal
supporters their due. Nor is he interested in claiming credit.
As someone who burnt his fingers by claiming credit for a
by-election victory soon after the electoral debacle in 1989 --
this cost him his membership of the AIADMK --
he is downplaying his role this time.
Anyway, his strategy to take over the AIADMK leadership --
should Jayalalitha throw in the towel -- seems
stymied for the present. The party's Pudukottai performance
appears to have revived Jayalalitha's political image
as nothing else has in recent months.
More than anyone else, it is the TMC, MDMK and the CPI-M that
have made their positions crucial to the electoral performance
of the two Dravidian majors.
The MDMK won 13,500 votes in Puddukottai. Given its one-point, anti-Karunanidhi
poll plank, the MDMK feels its need for a major partner, just as the AIADMK
is sure to look for a minor partner to work with.
It was only
to prove this point that the MDMK reportedly contested
the Pudukottai polls on its own, despite the efforts of Janata
Party president Subramanian Swamy to forge an anti-DMK alliance
under the AIADMK.
By scoring 5,100 votes on its own after parting company with the
MDMK post-1996 poll, the CPI-M has proved its
utility for the DMK, whose company it deserted only
a couple of years back.
But it is the TMC that got it right,
this time. While it has become indispensable for the DMK as an
electoral ally -- particularly after the formation of the MDMK --
the party leadership now seems convinced that it can chart out
its own course sooner than later.
The message from Pudukottai is clear. If the electorate across
the state cast its lot against the Jayalalitha dispensation
in the general election, they seem tired of the DMK
government's Jaya-baiting. That being
the case, the TMC leadership feels the people are now ready
to vote out both highhanded rulers and non-performing
governments, if an alternative could be found. The party would
like to project itself as the alternative, and might eventually part company
with the DMK to launch its own course.
|