rediff.com
rediff.com
Cricket Find/Feedback/Site Index
      HOME | SPORTS | STATISTICS
March 15, 2000

NEWS
SCHEDULES
COLUMNS
PREVIOUS TOURS
OTHER SPORTS
STATISTICS
INTERVIEWS
SLIDE SHOW
ARCHIVES

send this story to a friend

India tops

The other day, we had provided details of the nine biggest run chases in ODI history. While discussing the findings, we had pointed out a couple of cricketing ironies:

(a) India, supposedly one of the worst chasing teams in the world, has in fact chased 300+ twice;

(b) India, with one of the weakest bowling attacks in the world, has never been on the losing end where opponents chase big totals put up by India.

In response to this, a reader had written in, with this comment: "The reason that India does not find itself in the losers category could have to do with the kind of scores they set when playing first. One needs to see how many times has India set scores of 275+ and then defended it. It might be a good idea to check out how many times each of the cricketing nations have set scores of 275+ and then defended it. Another reason for not figuring in losers would also depend on who was the team chasing the score. I mean Bangladesh chasing a score of 300+ and not reaching does not mean anything."

Interesting mail. The most interesting aspect of it, to us, was that it provides another sign of the readiness with which we are prepared to devalue our own efforts, while glorifying that of others.

In response, here is an interesting table, which speaks for itself. In sum: on 19 occasions, India has posted totals in excess of 275 and successfully defended it, against not "Bangladesh", but against New Zealand, Sri Lanka, Australia, Pakistan, and West Indies, among others.

On the other hand, there has only been one single instance when India has scored over 275 and failed to defend it successfully.

So what does that tell you?

One, that we are only too ready to believe the worst of our team. And two, which is more important, that if the Indian batting clicks, India wins.

Food for thought? Meanwhile, here is the full table:

SCORES OVER 275 SUCCESSFULLY DEFENDED BY INDIA

Score Balls Faced For Vs Score Balls Faced Date Venue
376-2 313 Ind NZ 202 207 8/11/1999 Hyderabad (I)
373-6 306 Ind SL 216 262 26/05/1999 Taunton
329-2 302 Ind Ken 235-7 302 23/05/1999 Bristol
309-5 308 Ind Aus 268 284 1/04/1998 Cochin
307-6 303 Ind SL 301 302 7/07/1998 Khettarama
307-8 307 Ind Aus 263 291 28/10/1998 Dhaka
305-5 302 Ind Pak 277 275 15/04/1996 Sharjah
301-3 307 Ind Zim 269 300 9/04/1998 Cuttack
299-4 245 Ind SL 289-7 240 17/01/1987 Wankhede
296-4 307 Ind SL 247-9 255 29/08/1999 Colombo (SSC)
291-9 301 Ind SL 132-6 116 23/08/1997 Colombo (SSC)
289-6 301 Ind Aus 233 294 22/10/1987 Delhi (FSK)
289-3 300 Ind NZ 182 279 3/11/1994 Delhi (FSK)
289-6 303 Ind Aus 284 299 3/11/1996 Mohali
287-8 303 Ind Pak 248-9 294 9/03/1996 Bangalore
287-4 307 Ind SL 207 239 22/03/1999 Nagpur
286-6 301 Ind SL 235 285 30/03/1999 Poona
282-5 293 Ind WI 255-9 283 29/03/1983 Berbice
277-6 300 Ind Zim 170 233 1/10/1999 Nairobi (Gym)

SCORES OVER 275 UNSUCCESSFULLY DEFENDED BY INDIA

Scores Balls Faced For Versus Score Balls Faced Date Venue
287-4 301 Ind SA 288-2 284 14/11/1991 New Delhi


Mail Prem Panicker

HOME | NEWS | BUSINESS | MONEY | SPORTS | MOVIES | CHAT | INFOTECH | TRAVEL
SINGLES | NEWSLINKS | BOOK SHOP | MUSIC SHOP | GIFT SHOP | HOTEL BOOKINGS
AIR/RAIL | WEATHER | MILLENNIUM | BROADBAND | E-CARDS | EDUCATION
HOMEPAGES | FREE EMAIL | CONTESTS | FEEDBACK