« Back to article | Print this article |
"These decisions are further subject to review by an oversight committee headed by the Cabinet Secretary for the Union of India. Thus such monitoring as may be necessary to fight crime, for national security, or for counter-terrorism efforts is subject to multiple checks and oversight," he said.
The minister admitted that there were complaints or allegations of unauthorised or irregular phone interceptions but these were largely brought forward as "defence" taken by various accused during their trials, especially when prosecution relies upon such interception as evidence against the accused.
"The government or the state government as the case may be accordingly defends or explains such matter in the courts of competent jurisdiction. Sometimes such individuals in parallel or in addition also move complaints or petitions through the public grievance redressal mechanism which exists at various levels," he said.
Besides, Maken said, the government was also aware of various media reports alleging illegal phone tapping of politicians.
Maken's statement came in the midst of a raging controversy over leakage of tapes containing private conversations of some influential people with a corporate lobbyist.