Mumbai terror attack accused Tahawwur Rana has moved an 'emergency application' with the United States Supreme Court against his extradition to India, claiming that he will be tortured there since he is a Muslim of Pakistani origin.
Rana, 64, a Canadian national of Pakistani origin, is currently lodged at a metropolitan detention centre in Los Angeles.
He is known to be associated with Pakistani-American terrorist David Coleman Headley, one of the main conspirators of the 26/11 attacks.
Rana has filed an "Emergency Application For Stay" with the Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States and Circuit Justice for the Ninth Circuit.
President Donald Trump last month announced that his administration approved the extradition of 'very evil' Rana, wanted by Indian probe agencies for his role in the 26/11 attacks, 'to face justice in India'.
This followed the rejection of his review petition by the Supreme Court in January.
Now, Rana is seeking a stay of his extradition and surrender to India pending litigation (including exhaustion of all appeals) on the merits of a petition he filed on February 13.
In that petition, Rana argued that his extradition to India violates United States law and the United Nations Convention Against Torture 'because there are substantial grounds for believing that, if extradited to India, petitioner will be in danger of being subjected to torture'.
'The likelihood of torture in this case is even higher though as petitioner faces acute risk as a Muslim of Pakistani origin charged in the Mumbai attacks,' the application said.
The application also said that his 'severe medical conditions' render extradition to Indian detention facilities, a 'de facto' death sentence in this case.
It cited medical records from July 2024 showing that he has multiple 'acute and life-threatening diagnoses', including multiple documented heart attacks, Parkinson's disease with cognitive decline, a mass suggestive of bladder cancer, stage 3 chronic kidney disease, and a history of chronic asthma, and multiple COVID-19 infections.
"Accordingly, petitioner certainly has raised a credible, if not compelling, factual case that there are indeed substantial grounds for believing he would be in danger of torture if surrendered to Indian authorities.
"Further, because of his Muslim religion, his Pakistani origin, his status as a former member of the Pakistani Army, the relation of the putative charges to the 2008 Mumbai attacks, and his chronic health conditions he is even more likely to be tortured than otherwise would be the case, and that torture is very likely to kill him in short order."
The US Supreme Court denied Rana's petition for a writ of certiorari relating to his original habeas petition on January 21.
The application notes that on that same day, newly-confirmed Secretary of State Marco Rubio had met with External Affairs Minister Dr S Jaishankar.
When Prime Minister Modi arrived in Washington on February 12 to meet with Trump, Rana's counsel received a letter from the Department of State, stating that 'on February 11, 2025, the Secretary of State decided to authorise' Rana's 'surrender to India', pursuant to the 'Extradition Treaty between the United States and India'.
Rana's Counsel requested from the State Department the complete administrative record on which Secretary Rubio based his decision to authorize Rana's surrender to India.
The Counsel also requested immediate information on any commitment the US has obtained from India with respect to Rana's treatment.
'The government declined to provide any information in response to these requests,' the application said.
It added that given Rana's underlying health conditions and the State Department's findings regarding the treatment of prisoners, it is very likely 'Rana will not survive long enough to be tried in India'.
'The issues raised by petitioner merit full and careful consideration, and the stakes are enormous for him. The very least the US courts owe the petitioner is a full chance to litigate these issues, including exercising their appellate rights, before he is consigned to the fate that awaits him at the hands of the Indian government,' the application said.
It added that if a stay is not entered, there will be no review at all, and the US courts will lose jurisdiction, and 'petitioner will soon be dead. Therefore, we respectfully request that this Court enter an Order staying the extradition and surrender of petitioner pending a full and considered hearing on petitioner's claims by the district court, circuit court, and, if necessary, a writ of certiorari to and further proceedings before this Court'.
© 2025