Name:Balasubramaniam
Email:balu71@rediffmail.com
Your Views:The people of Iraq are behind him strongly and he has done a fair job in progressing the country. Unless there is a specific evidence that his continueance is a threat to World peace, there is no need for him to go
Thu Mar 20 16:07:02 2003
Name:Abdul Gaffar Jalaloddin Asadi
Email:ajasadi@rediffmail.com
Your Views:This is high handedness of Bush and his allies on Iraq and its innocent people (women & children) in the name of outsing Mr.Saddam and to save the world of chemical weapons. Is it the solution to oust Mr.Saddam by targetting innocent people by America, who claims to be the champion of Human Rights. Mr. Saddam is the President of Iraq chosen by the Iraqi people and Iraqis want him as their President. If at all Iraqi people want Mr.Saddam Hussain to step down they have the power to do so, but are not doing so as they have full faith in him and his government. Hence Mr.Saddam Hussain should not go. His going out is not the solution, but withdrawing the attack by US and their alleys is the solution, and in doing so the whole world will be with US government and support it in future.
Thu Mar 20 16:07:09 2003
Name:AJAY
Email:akk@usaf.com
Your Views:In my view war is just like one dictator asking another dictator to step down and replace his own dictatorship.I strongly condemm any act of terrorism be it from the Iraq side or be it a white collar murder like being done by Mr George Bush. Mr Bush who never travelled outside the USA seems to have shorter vision and lack of exposure in the world political scenario and adament like a child to take over the Moon. If Saddam has done something wrong it should be panalised but not by America , who is USA to decide the fate of millions of people of IRAQ ?? It will lead to the death of UN as today this may be the case between Iraq and USA , tommorow it may be another country against which Mr Bush become mad to rule and ask the govt of that state to step down. Infact Mr Bush is diverting the attention of the American people from the failture of economics and bussiness front in USA. Let the innocent people be free from war , I request Mr.President to set aside the adament behavoir for the benefit of Democracy. Despite being shamful ending in Afagan War and clueless about the Main Culprit in war after disturbing peace & harmony gained nothing. USA must take a lesson.
Thu Mar 20 16:07:23 2003
Name:Lekali
Email:nepali27@yahoo.com
Your Views:Democracy cannot be established by force and US attack is crowdedly and unjustified. The war is not meant for the establishment of democracy in Iraq but to fulfil the vested interest of US on oil resources. Nothing else than fulfilling the domestic need for fuel. But we have to see will it be similar to Vietnam War? Will American interest be fulfilled? Yes, this time oil is more important than human blood for US. Can one say US believes in democracy? One has to suspect why are they trying to through the elected president? What is the definition of democracy in US term? May be might is right (those who are strong should dominate the world by force) and share of the world resources should go to Britain and US???
Thu Mar 20 16:07:27 2003
Name:Siddhartha Ganguly
Email:sigal5@yahoo.co.in
Your Views:No. Not at the behest of USA or its allies. If he has to go, the Iraqi people should decide as to when and how he should go. President Saddam may be bad but there are many such bad people all around the world, even at the top positions in variuos governemnts. This must not be the reason to throw him out and put a puppet in his place. And not in this way. The world peace is disturbed and we, the common people of the third world are deeply distressed at such US aggression defying the United Nations. What does it show? USA is bigger than the UN and that is not good for the world. The balance of world power may tilt tomorrow, then what happens? USA, whom we look at as the super-power and epitome of technological excellence for the benfit of mankind - how can they kill thousands of innocent people in a country which is half dead due to 12-year old UN sanctions. We can only pray that this effort of USA does not lead to Third world war or more terrorist attacks leading to death of hundreds of innocent people. Only hope that this war will come to an end very fast before anything 'worse' and 'big' take place.
Thu Mar 20 16:07:37 2003
Name:Mukilan
Email:prokabil@rediffmail.com
Your Views:No.And .Never. But he has to sign to the UN that he wont use Biologiacal bombs in the future.
Thu Mar 20 16:07:37 2003
Name:Sting
Email:area54@rediffmaill.com
Your Views:Yes! Democracy should be acheived by force.All the world is playing a silent spectator when human rights are being violated on a large scale.This war should be the end of Saddam.It is high time the citizens of Iraq taste the spirit of Democracy.
Thu Mar 20 16:07:37 2003
Name:Nitin Rao
Email:ncr13@rediffmail.com
Your Views:Why should saddam go !!! Campaign started by Bush has gathered momentum through various US media of Saddam doing evil over people of Iraq. None of the stories can be verified or would come to people back as truth or made up stories. By utrocities what we hear through CNN happening in IRAQ may also be happening in US for people in general which are never reported or bad. US of A must not ACT as police over world, prime concern here in this WAR actualy will be what are the accruells USA & ENGLAND trying to gather for their own economy as well as votes for themselves since both the leaders have not turned around as what they promised to people in their respective country. Remains to be seen what will be the answer SADDAM gives to the attack , another funny news item is about IRAQ using chemical weapons, They were not given chance after inspection to destroy now US/UK started bombarding & expect SADDAM to give him self away quitly, Saddam should not use chemical weapon but US/UK can use in the name of better world??? Which world we are in ?? Tomorrow comes & we never know if US of A would like face of Saudi King or Indian leader since Uncle sam never liked them, Are we all ready?
Thu Mar 20 16:07:46 2003
Name:Ivanc
Email:ivanch@hotmail.com
Your Views:As per Mr. Bush Oil is thicker than blood. That is why he is killing lakhs of innocent people by bombing. To capture the oil rich country under their control. He is not fit to be a president of USA. Because American are asper my knowledge very nice people. But he is not. He has not thought that the IRAQIs are also human being. They are knowing how live in their country and who should rule their country. Bush should think of his country. If one American dies he will make so much hue and cry. Where his Missiles and Bomb and kill lakhs and lakhs of people. There are lot of childrens and aged people who can not run and take the shelter will be trapped under his Bombs and Missiles. The International community should come out against this kind of action. Let there be another world war. Another world war is better. Instead of surrundering to Mr. Bush. Bush is taken granted that all Americans are supporting him. God will help Saddam hussain and iraqi people from this assult. By Ivanc
Thu Mar 20 16:07:56 2003
Name:Ajay Kaul
Email:kaulajaykaul@rediffmail.com
Your Views:I think usa is bossing around a bit too much...it preaches a lot but doesnt practice even a bit of it. It's stand on Kashmir problem...support to Pakistan....asking india to maintain calm....all this on one side and it's own stand on Iraq and Afghanistan on other side. It does not have any evidence today against the Iraq Govt. and it is marching ahead to kill thousands of Iraqi civilians including women and children. I think the US is absolutely wrong...the situation is not so bad that he should declare a war...take the situation of india and pakistan...india has maintained so much restrain inspite of so much evidcence. And even the UN is not supporting such act of US. By going in for a war, Bush will prove himself for a bigger and a much more harmful dictator as compared to Saddam Hussain.
Thu Mar 20 16:08:09 2003
Name:ALLAHRAM
Email:allahram@hotmail.com
Your Views:Saddam should be sent to himalays and make him saadhu - he will enjoy this place make him renounce everything
Thu Mar 20 16:08:14 2003
Name:KS Kiran Kumar
Email:kskk@rediffmail.com
Your Views:It is just not the question whether Iraq is right or wrong by keeping weapons of mass destruction. Importantly, I do not understand what danger USA is envisaging, sitting thousands of Kilometers away from Iraq. For that matter, even USA is in possession of weapons of mass destruction. This is nothing but the bullying tactics of USA to take over the oil reserves in Iraq. Who the hell is USA to decide who will lead other countries. Bush Junior will be known to future generations as a war monging devil. As on today, if there is any rogue state, it is USA and not Pakistan :) Global political scenario now feels the absence of another super power to put brakes to USA's tantrums. I wish, all peace loving countries, shed their reservations and come out in public to criticise the ghastly acts of USA against small countries. May god bless all the people in Iraq and curse Bush Junior. W/Regards
Thu Mar 20 16:08:28 2003
Name:MADHU
Email:madhu_77433@redifmail.com
Your Views:America is acting too much, if the peoples of Iraq want democracy they will get it by protesting against saddam, bush shouldn't interfere in other country's business. I think Americans wants to be kings of world. If we don't protest it, one day they may come against India with Pakistanis.
Thu Mar 20 16:08:29 2003
Name:sudhakar.v
Email:vsr53@rediffmail.com
Your Views:US Still stands Justified though UN expressed its concern. US is highly selfish particularly Bush. Bush had to go.
Thu Mar 20 16:08:43 2003
Name:krishna kumar
Email:rkk1962in@yahoo.com
Your Views:Saddam in power or not is an extraneous issue. The issue is here we have a leader who talks about ethics and morality of war or the lack of it on the part of Iraq but whereas US has been the only country in the world who has been commitng these atrocities with impunity . Remember Hiroshima, Vietnam, 1991 BOMBING OF 100,000 conscripts in IRAQ well after the cease fire, Carpet bombing with daisy cutters in Afghan. Do wehave to listen to this moralistic vitriol from this despot?
Thu Mar 20 16:08:43 2003
Name:C. LEWIS
Email:junechris@hotmail.com
Your Views:Saddam will go... eventually. But what about Bush. He has started a trend which has made the world a free for all .
Thu Mar 20 16:09:13 2003
Name:Phanidhar Kolusu
Email:kolusu@siu.edu
Your Views:This is a decission Saddam has to take. But if I have to take give my virdict I have to place myself in his boots. Then if I were Saddam, in this situation there will be no question of leaving my naton leaving my folks to the mercy of an invader and the soveringty and cherished history and pride of the nation at the mercy of the conspirators. I will lead all the resources, citizens and their pride inthemselves in a such a way that my nation for generations to come will be proud of me and my co-patriots and add us in their folk lores. I will lead my poeple and fightback in such a grave fashion that the aggressor will feel ashamed of himself and tremle in his own boots and will be unnerved to handle his sophisticated equipment. I will make my soverign nation proud and put my life at the alter to provide the world with a buityful heroic story it can sing for years to come. There is no way to give up till the last drop of blood flows in the veins of a patriot. this blood was drawn from this soil and will fight till the last drop for this soil. JAI HIND
Thu Mar 20 16:09:15 2003
Name:Ranjit
Email:ranjit_panda@rediffmail.com
Your Views:Yes He should go.but peacefully not forcefully...He is an idiot and Dictator....
Thu Mar 20 16:09:16 2003
Name:Amandeep
Email:adchahil@yahoo.com
Your Views:No. he shouldn't go anywhere. he has to handle the situation. because citizens of iraq are with him.
Thu Mar 20 16:09:16 2003
Name:santhu
Email:santhu@rediffmail.com
Your Views:Sandam should not go. If Sadam ask Bush to go ...do he respect it. It is Iraq to decide who should rule.
Thu Mar 20 16:09:37 2003
Name:No he shouldnt go
Email:excuseme@excuseme.com
Your Views:One cannot fight for peace. America could have impossed more stringent laws thereby depriving them of almost all the necessary comodities and the supplies forcing Saddam's people to outcast him and thorw him out of power.
Thu Mar 20 16:09:46 2003
Name:Chandar
Email:A@B.COM
Your Views:saddam shud stay BUSH MUST GO
Thu Mar 20 16:09:51 2003
Name:zakir
Email:mohdzakir@yahoo.com
Your Views:if we accept that saddam has to go then we need to accept that the first and foremost to go should is to be Bush coz dont we feel that Bush is acting Insane than Saddam.
Thu Mar 20 16:09:51 2003
Name:Aurobindo Mukerji
Email:a_mukerjiin@yahoo.co.uk
Your Views:George Bush has no business to be in this region. George Bush has no business or authority to be talking the way he is. Whether Saddam should go or not, whether Bin Laden is bad or not is not the issue - the question is whether we need an insane character like George Bush at all - What right has he to be playing with the lives of millions in this region.
Thu Mar 20 16:09:56 2003
Name:Keshav Totla
Email:keshavtotla@yahoo.com
Your Views:No. Saddam must not go. Bush (not US)is using its superpower position in a wrong way. No physical evidences of biological weapons or weapons of mass destruction have been foung in Iraq. Further UN resolution has also not been obtained. Who in this world have given the right to Bush to attack any one whom he desires. Other countries must come forward and protest against him.
Thu Mar 20 16:10:13 2003
Name:N.Pandurang
Email:mpandu84@hotmail.com
Your Views:George Bush has shamed the US founding fathers and has violated all norms of a decent society. This is probably the 'costliest' family feud, Bush taking the US to war on behalf of his father. Economically & politically a disaster for US!!
Thu Mar 20 16:10:19 2003
Name:KD
Email:kdude311@hotmail.com
Your Views:Absolutely, Saddam has to go, evenif by force. Democracy has to be established anyhow, as the Muslim world has very little regard for Democracy and without it the world cannot have lasting peace. Only democracy can help protect muslims from falling into the trap of dictators & fundamentalists.
Thu Mar 20 16:10:42 2003
Name:Ataur Rahman
Email:arahman126@yahoo.com
Your Views:YES!SADDAM SHOULD GO. Beacuse the us needs oil and in the process if some innocent iraqi people die who cares!nobody dare challenge the us superemacy and it is a democratic country and it wants every country to be the same. we(US) dont care the wishes of our own people because we can sideline the democratic and diplomatic procedure because it was created for the us and it can break it at any time and nobody should speak against it because the US says so.yes saddam should go
Thu Mar 20 16:10:53 2003
Name:Sanjay Bhatt
Email:sanjaybhatt@rediffmail.com
Your Views:No he should not leave Iraq. I feel Americans have to Backtrack this time as they are not having world support and if war continues for more then 2 months then the victory will be of SADDAM
Thu Mar 20 16:11:00 2003
Name:sanjay patel
Email:sanjayccys@yahoo.com
Your Views:i believe that this is the war only for oil nothing else..If Iraq is having any mass destruction weapon then let it make clear by the UN authority.. Or if US likes the war against Iraq then they should convince the UN..They(US and its friends) should get an approval by UN... Please save the Iraq... As you cant buy your life once it lost... Blood is much thicker then oil.... american can understand this thing when they loss someone who are very close to their heart.. bye Sanjay
Thu Mar 20 16:11:28 2003
Name:Sunil
Email:gandhiji@vsnl.com
Your Views:On the contrary Bush should go and must go.India must reduce dependence on US and should take tough and active stand against the US.
Thu Mar 20 16:11:34 2003
Name:Guru Prasad
Email:knguru@yahoo..com
Your Views:US president Bush is NO. 1 teririst and should be punished first. It is jut the oil which is attracting him. OH god save America from Bush for the sake of the world pease.
Thu Mar 20 16:11:36 2003
Name:K Vinod Kumar
Email:vinod@arya.ncst.ernet.in
Your Views:No. Bush is a bully and a coward. After getting UN to disarm Iraq, Bush orders his high tech military to attack her. Americans think that if they offer green cards, scientists from other nations will defect. They think that other soldiers can be bribed to disobey orders. The US will learn its lesson.
Thu Mar 20 16:11:37 2003
Name:milind
Email:mdjoglekar@hotmail.com
Your Views:Why is american president is elected president. answer is no. it is only counting mistake of votes. a day will come that he will ask our prime miniter, president to go in exile. can we wait for that
Thu Mar 20 16:12:00 2003
Name:ashwani
Email:ashwani_1963@yahoo.com
Your Views:only one word no if iraqies r happy with him
Thu Mar 20 16:12:14 2003
Name:hari narayan
Email:jithuhari@yahoo.co.in
Your Views:it is the people of iraq to decide who should rule them. its none of americas buisness to what they call " redeem the iraqi people". those who have over thousands of ready to use nuclear weopens don't have any duty of de nuclearising a country which it thinks has the potential to make one in the next 20years time down the line. it will be innocent people of iraq who will be dying for americas oil politics.
Thu Mar 20 16:12:46 2003
Name:sidharth
Email:sidharth_debroy@rediffmail.com
Your Views:No. Mr. Saddam H. should not leave his country. its a prestige issuse. and what the allegation is made by U.S. i think they are wrongly and wronglyfully attack Iraq. after the UN inspecton it is clear that Iraq does not have any weapons of mass destruction. And condemn this war against IRaq
Thu Mar 20 16:12:47 2003
Name:Karan
Email:karan1981@rediffmail.com
Your Views:Of course Saddam should go. He has proved he is an evil dictator. But the question is what is worth giving up to make him go, how many lives need to be wasted. I personally would rather let him stay for a few years than kill a few thousand civilians.
Thu Mar 20 16:13:00 2003
Name:karunamoorthy
Email:karna_here@yahoo.com
Your Views:This Bludy Junior Bush should go.
Thu Mar 20 16:13:33 2003
Name:S. Sridhar
Email:ssridhar@pobox.com
Your Views:Saddam need not go just because US wants him to. Firstly, they are wrong in interfering into the rights of a country to elect its rulers; secondly, they have begun these attacks in blatant defiance of the UN directive which is ridiculous to say the least. Finally, they cannot play GOD to the world. They may next go to N Korea under the pretext of arms pile up and finally land up in our neighbourhood (Pakistan, where else) stating that Musharraf & party are supporting Al Qaeda or whoever. This HAS TO stop and all sane minded countries should get together at this hour of need to make world bodies like NAM relevant!
Thu Mar 20 16:13:37 2003
Name:sana
Email:sanad@rediffmail.com
Your Views:US has sidelined international bodies like UN and NATO. They have no respect for anyone. They are out for cleansing the world of all evil like a school bully. Who has given US the right to go around killing innocent people in the name of peace? Will the world now be controlled by Bush Jr and his cronies? What terrorism threat does Iraq have to US? Countries like India have been facing terrorism for years but refrain from war understanding its seriousness. Had a war been fought on US ground, perhaps that paranoid nation wudnt have been so eager to have innocent blood shed. Right now its all happening in foreign lands. For power and violence crazy US, its just another Rambo film! Shame on the so-called super power for playing a world bully.
Thu Mar 20 16:14:55 2003
Name:Observer
Email:observer@rediffmail.com
Your Views:The majority of people in Iraq must have a chance to elect their own leader. Instead of a having rigged/fake elections which give 100% vote to anyone Iraq needs "REAL" elections for the benefit of the people.
Thu Mar 20 16:15:28 2003
Name:Maqsood Alam
Email:fatto76@yahoo.com
Your Views:Saddam must be rule in Iraq and never been omit from the people of Iraq as well as people who believe in Islam because attack on Iraq means US attack on Islam.
Thu Mar 20 16:15:43 2003
Name:mehadi ali baig
Email:mehadimegha_23@rediffmail.com
Your Views:this being bad to proclaim prejuidical war over iraq without laying any causes for the war by american president and i am being indian muslim with the power to speak as my right stand against the unwanted war against iraq.
Thu Mar 20 16:15:43 2003
Name:causarhina
Email:causarhina@netscape.net
Your Views:WOuld you have asked the same question if Bush were asked to quit USA? Would YOU want to quit your homeland, because a bully asks? USA for all its 'greatness' is just a vehicle for the latest anti-christ, GEORGE W BUSH, Jr.! While Saddam Hussein is no innocent, neither is Bush! SO how would Bush react to anyone telling HIM to beat it, out of USA? SO why should he & his coterie expect Saddam to vacate? Insult upon injury? He controls the largest arsenal of Mass destruction-proudly talks about them too!.....yet, Iraq is the villian! Tomorrow, US Troops & bombers will move into Iraq from Kuwait (illegitimate offspring of USA & UK), and move towards the Southern Oil fields (the PRIME US OBJECTIVE), then, onto Baghdad. The other illegitimate offspring (ISRAEL) is smirking with glee... deliberately kept out of the news & arguments...despite the daily massacre of Lebanese! The greatest beneficiary of this WAR! BUSH ....who will get the Jewish $s and weapons... and control of the gulf oil! The greatest terrorist is BUSH,with his droves of terrorists who will massacre Iraqis to vindicate his father's blackened face .. Avenging his father's defeat is his inspiration !
Thu Mar 20 16:16:02 2003
Name:avik
Email:aviksengupta@pioneerpipes.com
Your Views:balls!!! plz cut d crap...n let's be honest here........our views don' count.
Thu Mar 20 16:16:38 2003
Name:Hari Prakash
Email:sinha_hp@yahoo.co.in
Your Views:I fully agree with the view that democracy can not be established by force. It is people of the country who can establish democracy. And lookig at the attitude of US towards a world body, I feel outragous. Why US has not same kind of view for other countries of the world who are dangerous like Pakistan, North Korea and others. Saddam must remain in power so that US could realize thar on a world forum she can not act on her own. It is being said that Saddam is not elected representative of his country, but that is true to many country. This is war for oil and business obviously and no rational human can support this.
Thu Mar 20 16:16:50 2003
Name:senthil
Email:senthilsenthil_sk@rediffmaiol.com
Your Views:why?why?why?,why is the Americans crying for saddam's blood? but iam not supporting him.i feel he is a very selfish and cruel. he could have averted this war by leaving the country,atleast for the sake of his people who were so obedient and loyal to him. why is he pulling them to the land of no return. And also our own big uncle sam acting to be the policeman of this world have other ideas. in the sake of cleaning chemical weapons,they are looking with a cunning eye towards the oil wealth of the arabs.By disobeying UN they are clearly becoming arrogant and showing it out. Power rules isn't it?.With every one praying to avert the war why Bush and Saddam is busy in sacrifising innocent people.They don't know the meaning and value of life. I would say after opting for war both the leaders should have gone to the war front and fight till their end.War is never a solution to anything but only gives rise to thousand other problems.our noble laurates has nothing to say about this?where is the UN?Where are the world leaders? Man, our future is not safe. Definitly not safe.
Thu Mar 20 16:18:04 2003
Name:Sridhar Nandivada
Email:sridharnandi@rediffmail.com
Your Views:MISTAKE OF THE MILLENIUM!!! GO SADDAM GO !!!! Rippp the US Army. Jr. Bush and Tony have launched an illegal attack against a sovereign nation against international law, against the consensus of public opinion and without any reason other than the fact that they misjudged the international climate of public opinion. They have gone too far and were unable to turn back. Even if they want to take back a step back now, it costs more $$$ move artillery and Army than they have invested. This is not a holy war. The war is to get complete hold of the Oil in Iraq. Chemical and Biological weapons is only the outer flavor that Jr. Bush and Tony is showing to rest of the world. If these two Countries can declare war against Terrorism, India can also declare War against Pakistan which has got a noble cause. Jr. Bush and Tony has got no right to kill innocent human beings in Iraq. I have only one wish - America should face 2 more similar attacks of September 11 attacks. This time - destruction should be 100 times more than Sep 11 attacks. But humans should not die. Only the destruction of bridges and buildings (National property). Then Jr. Bush will understand the result of war. I mean it.
Thu Mar 20 16:18:05 2003
Name:Vijay
Email:trsvijay@yahoo.com
Your Views:George Bush - the face of America well expresses the autocracy of americans towards other nations.Are the rules and laws are not applicable for the lawmakers? US says Saddam is having dangerous weapons and for the cause of world peace they attack Iraq. Does this not appicable to US who have more and more dangerous weapons than any other country in the world? Why does US wants Saddam to move out of the country?? If George Bush is asked to leave US for the cause of world peace ,will he accept it???? Who is Bush to establish democracy in Iraq????Have Iraq people elected Bush as their president to do it???? War is a mear GAME for US to test their dangerous Weapons among the Innocent civilians of Iraq and acquire the Land of Oil resources.Today US takes the innocent lives of Iraq for acquiring Oil resources ????Tommorow it may happen to any other country ......God save the world from the Americans.....
Thu Mar 20 16:18:06 2003
Name:keertika
Email:keertika_rawat@yahoo.com
Your Views:No I don't think that Bush or anyone person has the right to force Democracy. By doing so the entire essence of Democracy is lost, democracy is also giving people the right to choose for themselves. In any case Saddam has a right to stay where he is it is Bush who should stop trying to play the Knight in shinning armour. And as far as the UN is concerned I think they have turned themselves into a Cosmic Joke!
Thu Mar 20 16:18:36 2003
Name:Srikrishna
Email:skbhat@rediffmail.com
Your Views:Saddam need not leave Iraq in any case. It is really inspiring to see some body who can atleast dare to fight against reckless Americans.
Thu Mar 20 16:18:36 2003
Name:Bala
Email:balav121@rediffmail.com
Your Views:Yes. It might be a rather difficult decision for him to make since it involves sacrificing himself for saving miseris to his nation. But given his track record, he is not going to go away till he is finished. I think even the objective of the US led coalition is to get rid of Saddam more than anything with this war. But even after war, I think Iraqi people are not going to get justice. They will be in the mercy of the victors viz. US and probably some part of the booty will still be available to them for keeping.
Thu Mar 20 16:19:14 2003
Name:prashanth
Email:prashanth.bhat@iflexsolutions.com
Your Views:The question is is it more to it than OIL, Clearly now the base line should be OIL and not anything like weapons.America has not learnt after september 11, for god, country and coca cola !! led by a half baked moron !
Thu Mar 20 16:20:20 2003
Name:Samit Pal
Email:samit04@rediffmail.com
Your Views:Who is Mr Bush to remove the leader of a country when the people of that country wants that leader. Its amazing how the US changes their objective. While initially it was to disarm iraq, now it is to oust saddam. One wonders what the actual motive is??
Thu Mar 20 16:20:29 2003
Name:suraj prasad
Email:suru_prasad@rediffmail.com
Your Views:bombs away... history is written by those who win, and here again it will be written by US. Few years later everyone will forget what actually happened. But is it so the case again? American may have pushed it luck to far this time. it has spelled a doomsday senario for the world.If America feels its security is essential so is those of the other nations, like INDIA, Russia and North Korea. Democracy and never be installed by force...look at Pakistan, Zimbabwe and Figi, it comes naturally as a soul of a nation. Regarding Saddam, we dont know if he has to go or not. If his qualities are seen as bad then there are many like him around the world who still rule with out any obstruction. Look at Burma, the military govt. took over, removing a democratic elected govt. Why dint US interfare then. Well if oil is found maybe we will see few cruise missiles firing away. Till Then...lets hope this world can be a better place to live where people will care and fight for more important issues. thats all..from a management student prespective, who is graduating into the corporate world shorty.
Thu Mar 20 16:20:34 2003
Name:Pankaj Mehta
Email:pankaj_mehta3@rediffmail.com
Your Views:NO. Not because one man in the world wants him to go and unfortunately he possess wide range of economic and military power than he should. in fact by attacking iraq, america is strengthening the hands of militants and will result in high level of anti west feeling in other countries.
Thu Mar 20 16:20:36 2003
Name:GANESH
Email:gan_01@indiainfo.com
Your Views:for one family one paerson can die, for one village one family can die, for one contry one village people can die, for one person one contry should not die. Mr Saddam has to take a decision
© 2025