The court asked MHA that the summonses issued against the websites should be returnable by September 22.
"Let the accused (social networking websites) be summoned through the assistance of the MHA, Government of India. The summonses shall be returnable on September 22," metropolitan magistrate Jay Thareja said.
These websites named in the complaint filed by Vinay Rai includes -- Facebook, Orkut, Youtube, Yahoo, Blogspot, Google and Microsoft.
Besides this, the court discharged two accused websites, Shyni Blog and Exbii, after the complainant's counsel SPM Tripathi told the court that they do not want to proceed with the complaint against the two websites as their addresses have not been found despite all efforts.
"In view of the statement made by the advocate for the complainant, the complaint is dismissed against accused Exbii and Shyni Blog," the magistrate said.
The court, on the last date of hearing, had told Rai to come out with the modalities of serving the summonses to the foreign-based websites.
As the day's proceedings began, advocate Tripathi said they could send the summonses served to the websites through courier service.
Senior advocate Siddharth Luthra, who appeared for Facebook India, said as per the 2009 guidelines of the MHA, the summons are required to be sent to foreign countries through the ministry and the process will take at least 12 weeks time.
During the arguments, the magistrate said some of the accused named in the complaint are just "brand names" and no other information, including their addresses, have been mentioned anywhere in the complaint.
"There is no natural person or juristic person (in some of the accused named in the complaint). Whom will I try? My difficulty is that some brand names have been named as accused without any information about them," the magistrate said, adding that the complainant should give the addresses of these accused websites to the court.
The court also said it wants to segregate the cases of the websites as it would lead to a trial which will go on for long.
Earlier, the court had given a Union law ministry circular, dealing with the service of process in foreign countries, to Rai's counsel.
According to the circular, Process Forward International is an agency authorised by the Central Authority, USA, to receive the summons / notices under Hague Convention of 1956 and as per it, the central authorities in Canada are charging a cost of 50 dollars for the process of service.
The Centre had earlier told the court that there was sufficient material to proceed against the social networking sites for the alleged offences.
The court had on December 23 last year issued summons to 21 social networking websites for allegedly committing offences of criminal conspiracy, sale of obscene books and objects to young persons.
