The Congress on Tuesday admitted that the Section 66A of cyber law, introduced by the United Progressive Alliance regime in 2008, was poorly drafted and vulnerable to misuse after the provision was struck down by the Supreme Court.
The party, however, tried to deflect criticism by targeting Modi government on its stand in the court on the provision which allows arrest of a person for posting allegedly offensive content on websites.
Congress leader P Chidambaram welcomed the Supreme Court judgement holding Section 66A of the IT Act as unconstitutional.
"I welcome the judgement of the Supreme Court holding that Section 66A of the IT Act is unconstitutional.
"The section was poorly drafted and was vulnerable. It was capable of being misused and, in fact, it was misused," he said.
Party spokesperson Sanjay Jha questioned why the Modi government had ‘stoutly defended continuity’ of the provision in the apex court when Narendra Modi had once openly opposed the provision before becoming the prime minister.
"To all those bhakts criticising @KapilSibal, Modi Sarkar stoutly defended continuity of #Sec66A in SC. Smell the coffee beans, folk," Jha said on Twitter.
In another tweet, he said," Narendra Modi turned his DP (display picture) black to protest against #Sec66A. Then he did his classic U-turn to argue for it in Supreme Court as PM."
Party MP from Kerala Shashi Tharoor tweeted "Glad the Supreme Court has struck down Section 66A of the IT Act, which was liable to misuse (&has been abused). Freedom must not be curbed."
Terming liberty of thought and expression as ‘cardinal’, a bench of justices J Chelameswar and R F Nariman said, "The public's right to know is directly affected by section 66A of the Information Technology Act."
Justice Nariman also said that the provision ‘clearly affects’ the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression enshrined under the Constitution.
The bench also rejected the assurance given by the National Democratic Alliance government during the hearing that certain procedures may be laid down to ensure that the law in question is not abused.
The government had also said that it will not misuse the provision.
"Governments come and go but section 66A will remain forever," the bench said, adding the present government cannot give an undertaking about its successor that they will not abuse the same.
