India's national security focus has shifted from the western border to the eastern one.
But our trade with China keeps rising.
This trade is against our interest, because most of it comprises of Chinese imports, argues Aakar Patel.
RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das said last week that the government and the RBI are in discussions with South Asian countries to have cross-border trade in the rupee.
There was no other detail given, such as which countries India was in discussion with and at what stage these discussions were.
But it is still a good move.
The reason is that we in South Asia, or undivided India to make it more clear, are damaging ourselves by refusing to trade with each other.
The World Bank says that trade between South Asian nations accounts for only 5 per cent of the region's total trade.
To compare this, in the ASEAN region (comprising Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Viet Nam) intraregional trade is 25 per cent of the total, meaning five times as much.
ASEAN has a three-point agenda when it comes to trading between each other: Economic integration, adherence to multilateral trade rules and gradual elimination of all barriers.
On the other hand, trade among South Asian countries currently totals just $23 billion -- below an estimated current value of at least $67 billion.
And most of this lost trade is our loss.
Consider that with Bangladesh, of the $18 billion in current trade, India's exports to Bangladesh are $16 billion.
Exports to Pakistan as less than $1 billion and imports under $100 million.
Pakistan is an economy the size of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, and Bangladesh is even bigger.
And yet we have not done more to expand the market for our goods and services.
Of course, to do this we also have to open our borders to them and this is where the problem of will lies.
The World Bank says 'border challenges mean it is about 20 percent cheaper for a company in India to trade with Brazil instead of a neighboring South Asian country.'
The challenges being referred to are quite basic.
Some are understandable, like the lack of infrastructure, whether through road, sea or air.
The most feasible and economic route for trade with Pakistan is the land route.
The only operational rail route was through the Wagah border.
For the last four years there has been no train and no air linkages between the two nations.
Goods from Kolkata were shipped to Karachi through Singapore.
Other problems include protective tariffs. Only 137 products were allowed through land route to Pakistan.
In 2019, India hiked customs duty on all Pakistan goods to 200% after the Pulwama attack.
Still other non-tariff barriers include issuance of visas to traders and exporters and importers.
Restrictions on investments and a general suspicion have hampered trade further.
The numbers of wagons that can commute from Attari to Amritsar are restricted.
Yet another problem is payments.
Letters of credit, which are guarantees from a bank that the buyer will pay the seller on time and with the right amount, issued by Pakistani banks are not accepted in India and vice versa.
Customs clearance through e-filing is not available on the land route into India from Pakistan.
They have also complained that our customs authorities create special problems, often on grounds of security and usually goods are held up for a long time.
When I last visited Pakistan through the land border, in 2014, trucks were lined up with no sign of movement.
India does not allow Pakistan transit facilities through its territory to Bangladesh and Nepal, showing that it is not just security that is a concern but the idea that we do not want to trade with Pakistan even if it means harming our exports.
This is the sort of mindset that exists and for this reason I said it is a good idea that we are thinking of more cross-border trade.
The question is whether we have considered that this means two things.
First that what we take we also have to give.
In the past the taking and giving has all been negative for the most part.
That is the reason why trade is so low, as the World Bank has noted.
The second reason is that we have to let go the mindset that we are dealing with a permanent enemy.
India's national security focus has shifted in the last two-and-a-half years from the western border to the eastern one.
But our trade with China keeps rising.
This trade is against our interest, because most of it comprises of Chinese imports.
China's exports to India during January-November 2022 increased 24% to $108 billion over the previous year.
Our exports to China fell 38% to $16 billion.
But we continue to trade with them, even though it is now generally accepted by everyone including the government itself that our primary national security threat is China.
On the other hand, we have seemingly changed our position on our other neighbours, but for some reason we have not changed our attitude.
Aakar Patel is a columnist and writer and you can read Aakar's earlier columns here.
Feature Presentation: Aslam Hunani/Rediff.com
