Rediff Logo Money
Line
Home > News > PTI > Report Feedback  
29-11-2002:16:04:48
  Sections

 -  NEWSLINKS
 -  US EDITION
 -  SOUTH ASIA
 -  COLUMNISTS
 -  DIARY
 -  SPECIALS
 -  INTERVIEWS
 -  CAPITAL BUZZ
 -  REDIFF POLL
 -  DEAR REDIFF
 -  THE STATES
 -  ELECTIONS
 -  ARCHIVES
 -  SEARCH REDIFF








 Secrets every
 mother should
 know



 Your Lipstick
 talks!



 Need some
 Extra Finance?



 Bathroom singing
 goes techno!



 
 Search the Internet
          Tips


Print this page Best Printed on  HP Laserjets
E-Mail this report to a friend

Ayodhya cases to be tried at Rae Bareily: SC

The Supreme Court on Friday said all cases pertaining to the demolition of the disputed structure in Ayodhya on December 6, 1992, including the one against Deputy Prime Minister Lal Kishenchand Advani and seven other senior Bharatiya Janata Party and Vishwa Hindu Parishad leaders, would now be tried by a special court at Rae Bareily.

The question as to which court had the juridiction over the sensitive Ayodhya cases arose after the Allahabad high court quashed a Uttar Pradesh government notification of October 1993 assigning the trial of a case against Advani, Union Human Resources Minister Murli Manohar Joshi, Union Minister for Coal and Mines Uma Bharti and five others to a special court at Lucknow.

Following this, the state government on September 28 this year issued a notification in consultation with the high court assigning the trial of all Ayodhya cases to a special court at Rae Bareily.

Disposing a bunch of petitions challenging the high court order quashing the October 1993 notification, a bench comprising Chief Justice G B Pattanaik, Justice K G Balakrishnan and Justice Arun Kumar said now that the trial had been assigned to the Rae Bareily court, "we see no justification in the petitions."

When counsel for one of the petitioners, Mohammad Aslam alias Bhure, insisted that the trial be held at Lucknow, the bench said: "No person, much less the petitioners in public interest, can claim for a special court at a special place for the trial of a case."

Appearing for the state government, senior advocate K K Venugopal said the high court had rightly quashed the October 1993 notification as it was issued without its (court's) consultation, which is mandatory under the Criminal Procedure Code.

 

Back to top
(c) Copyright 2002 PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent.

Tell us what you think of this report
ADVERTISEMENT
dot
Channels:

News:
Shopping:
Services:
Astrology | Auto | Contests | E-cards | Food | Health | Home & Decor | Jobs | Lifestyle | Matrimonial
Money | Movies | Net Guide | Product Watch | Romance | Tech.Edu | Technology | Teenstation | Travel | Women
News | Cricket | Sports | NewsLinks
Shopping | Books | Music
Personal Homepages | Free Email | Free Messenger | Chat
dot
rediff.com
  © 2002 rediff.com India Limited. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer