rediff.com
rediff.com
News
      HOME | NEWS | PTI | REPORT
Wednesday
November 13, 2002
1606 IST

NEWSLINKS
US EDITION
SOUTH ASIA
COLUMNISTS
DIARY
SPECIALS
INTERVIEWS
CAPITAL BUZZ
REDIFF POLL
DEAR REDIFF
THE STATES
ELECTIONS
ARCHIVES
SEARCH REDIFF








 Click for confirmed
 seats to India!



 Is your Company
 registered?



 Spaced Out ?
 Click Here!



 Secrets every
 mother should
 know



 Rediff NRI
 Finance
 Click here!


 Search the Internet
         Tips

E-Mail this report to a friend
Print this page Best Printed on HP Laserjets


Madras high court stays temple notification by Centre

The Madras high court on Wednesday stayed implementation of a notification by the Centre proposing to declare the Arunachaleswarar temple in Tiruvannamalai as a national heritage.

Issuing the direction on a petition filed by the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Commissioner, M A Gowrishankar, challenging the October 21 notification by the Archaeological Survey of India, Justice R Balasubramaniam issued notice to the secretary of department of culture and the ASI.

On November 11, the state government had filed a petition against the notification, declaring the temple as a national monument.

In the writ petition, the commissioner had pointed out that an appeal against a scheme drawn up by the high court for management of the temple was pending in the Supreme Court.

He said the government had declared Tiruvannamalai as a heritage town in 1993 and introduced guidelines, which led to a controversy over maintenance of a girivalam [park] around the temple and filing of several writ petitions against the government.

He contended that one of the petitioners had sought declaration of the temple as a monument and the Centre, in its counter affidavit, had taken the position that it could not be so. The notification was contrary to its earlier stand and a 'colourable' exercise of power.

It also did not contain any material to enable persons concerned to file objections. It would take away the powers of trustees and other authorities, affecting day-to-day affairs.

Seeking to quash the notification, the petitioner had also sought a stay of its operation till disposal of his petition or maintenance of status quo.

Back to top
(c) Copyright 2002 PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent.

Tell us what you think of this report

ADVERTISEMENT      
NEWS | MONEY | SPORTS | MOVIES | CHAT | CRICKET | SEARCH
ASTROLOGY | CONTESTS | E-CARDS | NEWSLINKS | ROMANCE | WOMEN | TRAVEL
SHOPPING | BOOKS | MUSIC | PERSONAL HOMEPAGES | FREE EMAIL| MESSENGER | FEEDBACK