Rediff.com« Back to articlePrint this article

'Stop Pitching Urdu Against Hindi'

February 19, 2024 16:29 IST

'Urdu is the language of Hindustan.'

IMAGE: Gulzar launches a series of paintings, Ghalib & Gulzar, by Shahid Rassam in 2015. Photograph: Sahil Salvi

Even at 89, the awards aren't stopping any time soon for Gulzar.

Bollywood's icon received the Jnanpith award, India's highest literary honour, and Subhash K Jha retrieves an interesting throwback interview with Gulzar, where he had said, "Since literary circles perceive me as a man from cinema, therefore, I've had difficulty in obtaining the approval of literary masters."

As a Sikh, how do you explain your love for the Urdu language?

Urdu is my favourite language. I know no better means of communication.

My writings -- even my diary -- are written in Urdu.

I can also write in Devnagari, Bengali and English, but not as fluently as Urdu.

I'm happy because it's an award for my written work. You know, writing has been my primary passion.

A book has always been more fulfilling than a film.

In writing a book, aisa kabhi nahin hota ke koi hasrat baqi reh gayi. Though with a film, I can touch crores of hearts at one go, a book has more of me than a film.

The medium of writing is the most autonomous, complete, fulfilling and self-dependent form of creativity.

In writing, you can never complain about things going wrong. Good or bad, you have to stand by your creativity.

Cinema is more collaborative.

There's always the danger of someone spoiling your work or you spoiling someone's work.

In writing, you can give expression to all the thoughts and feelings that cannot be communicated in a mass medium.

I've been writing more poetry than prose in Urdu. Poetry is a bigger passion for me.

I'd rather be recognised as a poet. Maybe someday....

 

IMAGE: Gulzar and Hema Malini at the launch of Yatindra Mishra's book,Gulzar Saab: Hazara Rahein Mud Ke Dekhin. Photograph: Hitesh Harisinghani/Rediff.com

Is writing really more satisfying than cinema?

It's not a question of more or less satisfying.

I've always been more passionate about writing.

Writing has always been the foundation of all my creative activities.

I came to cinema as a writer. Screenplays, dialogues and film-making are branches of my writing roots.

In cinema, my name as a writer became easily recognisable.

This has also been a handicap for me as a writer since literary circles perceive me as a man from cinema and therefore, I've had difficulty in obtaining the approval of literary masters.

Do you feel you are able to get a larger readership for your literary works because of your association with cinema?

I'd say so. But it's hard to tell if people read my books after coming to my films or they see my films after reading my books.

How does one explain your interest in Urdu?

The credit must go to two people: Ahmed Nadeem Qazmi from Pakistan who encouraged me to write and Urdu critic Gopi Chand Narang. Narangsaab was among the first people to comment on my stories. He always encouraged me.

How did you develop an interest in Urdu?

It was the first language that I learnt in school in Punjab. Every male child studied Urdu as the first language, not Punjabi.

Even Punjabi was written in the Urdu script and is still written in Urdu in Pakistan.

Interestingly, the women in Punjab studied Hindi, with the result that husbands and wives couldn't communicate with each other directly through letters!

IMAGE: Gulzar with the Dadasaheb Phalke Award, 2013. Photograph: Kind courtesy Wikimedia Commons

Do you think Urdu is dying?

Not the language, but the script is changing.

Like I said, Urdu was the accepted language in Punjab and several northern states before Partition.

But in the last 50 years, Punjabi is written in Gurmukhi in India while it continues to be written in Persian in Pakistan.

So it's the script that is changing. I can say the Urdu script in Punjabi is dying out.

Urdu is written in Devnagari in our country.

Yet, 70 to 80 percent of the language spoken in our films is Urdu. So obviously the language itself isn't dying.

In fact, Gandhiji had once suggested we call Urdu Hindustani. I think it was a very wise suggestion.

Urdu is the language of Hindustan, so let's stop pitching Urdu against Hindi.

Do you feel it's as much the spoken language as Hindi?

I can give you several examples. Shabana Azmi and Naseeruddin Shah can't write Urdu.

But Naseer, who's from Meerut, played Mirza Ghalib very effectively in my serial.

Both of them speak Urdu beautifully.

In modern India, Devnagri isn't a vehicle to communicate only Hindi, but also a vehicle to communicate Urdu in our country.

In course of time, the prejudices against Urdu will die out.

How will these prejudices will die down?

The people's language will prevail.

In India, the people's language is neither the Urdu nor the Hindi that's being propagated by Pakistan and India.

SUBHASH K JHA