During proceedings before broadcast tribunal TDSAT, which is hearing the case related to signal sharing, TataSky's counsel argued that "Turner's officials were actively involved in the negotiation with its agent (Zee-Turner)" and never once offered to share their feed (such as CNN and HBO) with the DTH operator.
Turner had approached TDSAT last week seeking deletion of its name from the tribunal's order, which observed some broadcasters had failed to provide signals to the direct-to-home operator.
The Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal on March 31 observed that all the respondents -- Turner International (India), Zee Telefilms, ASC Enterprises and Zee-Turner -- had defaulted in providing signals to TataSky on non-discriminatory
basis.
The DTH operator contended that Turner (India) was also a defaulter in the case.
"It hardly matters whether the channels are provided to us by their agent or the owner itself," said the counsel, adding that as per the Indian Contract Act, a master is liable for the act done by his agent.
Taking note of this, the TDSAT bench asked Turner (India) why did it support Zee-Turner non-sharing of signal with TataSky. "You could have taken an independent stand," it added.
