 | « Back to article | Print this article |
If you had invested Rs 1 lakh at the peak of 2008 (when the Sensex hit 20,582), your corpus would be worth only Rs 1.32 lakh now, a miserable CAGR of 3.79 per cent — even less than the savings deposit rate.
Are investors being sold a lemon when financial planners insist that they stay invested in equities for the long term?
Every fund manager and financial planner has a single piece of advice for retail investors: Stay invested in equities for the long term. And, whether it is retirement corpus, children’s education or any other long-term goal, the same advice is given out.
How long is long-term? When returns over five years or eight years are bad, investment planners are quick to say the tenure should be longer.
At the very outset, let’s set the record straight.
Equity investments are fruitful over the very long 20-year term.
According to data compiled by Business Standard Research Bureau, a lump sum amount of Rs 1 lakh invested in the BSE Sensitive Index, or Sensex, in July 1996 would have grown to Rs 7.33 lakh (compound annual growth rate of 10.48 per cent).
In comparison, the same amount invested in gold (India/per 10 gm) would have become Rs 6.1 lakh (CAGR 9.55 per cent) and in a State Bank of India one-year fixed deposit would be Rs 4.6 lakh (average 7.95 per cent).
Of course, if one has invested in a, good mutual fund scheme, the returns would have been very high over this period.
For example, HDFC Equity Fund has returned 19.56 per cent CAGR since January 1995, Reliance Growth Fund has returned 23.73 annually since October 1995, and one of the oldest funds, Franklin India Bluechip, has returned 21.99 per cent since 1993.
Events and returns
Investing in equities can be frustrating for long periods of time.
For example, if you had invested Rs 1 lakh at the peak of 2008 (when the Sensex hit 20,582) before the world markets went into a tailspin, your corpus would be worth only Rs 1.32 lakh now, a miserable CAGR of 3.79 per cent — even less than the savings deposit rate.
Gold was a saviour between January 2008 and July 2016, with returns of 14.78 per cent annually, while fixed deposits (SBI’s one-year rate) was 8.14 per annually.
Similarly, if you were bullish about the prospects of the Modi government and its impact on the stock markets, you would be disappointed with annual returns of only 5.66 per cent.
The good news: Gold did worse at 4.29 per cent but fixed deposits scored at 8.40 per cent. Clearly, the numbers will keep on changing as we change the time horizon.
The investor has to be smart enough to stay invested in good as well as bad times to earn more than decent returns.
Mutual fund investors have scored over various time horizons
The message that comes across over the 10-year horizon (see table) is that trailing returns of large-cap funds (12.36 per cent) were better than that of broad market benchmarks like the Nifty or the Sensex.
Returns for gold (standard gold Mumbai) were slightly higher (12.84 per cent) than the average for the large-cap category.
Public Provident Fund (PPF) returns have been lower at 8.32 per cent compound annually over the past decade.
Fixed deposit rates, if you use the SBI one-year term deposit as our benchmark, have ranged between six per cent and 10 per cent over the past decade (though some other banks may have offered slightly higher interest rates).
Trailing returns of other categories of diversified equity funds like multi-cap (13.55 per cent), mid-cap (15.63 per cent) and small-cap funds (14.39 per cent) were higher than that of the large-cap category over the 10-year horizon (see table).
If you had a 40 per cent allocation to large-caps, 30 per cent to multi-cap, 20 per cent to mid-cap and 10 per cent to small-cap funds, your weighted average return over the 10-year period would have been 13.57 per cent, better than that of gold and fixed-income instruments.
Over the three- and five-year horizons, equity mutual funds trounced the market benchmarks (Sensex and Nifty) and gold, PPF, and fixed deposits quite easily.
It is only over the one-year horizon that the trailing return (the rate you earn when you invest a lump sum amount) of diversified equity funds (barring small-cap) lag that of gold and fixed income products.
SIP trumps lump sum
Our number crunching over 10 years also demonstrated unambiguously that Systematic Investment Plan (SIP) investing is a much better way to ride diversified equity funds than lump sum investing.
Only over the three-year horizon have SIPs underperformed lump sum investments. This was a period when the markets rose around 40 per cent, and SIPs tend to underperform in such rising markets.
Over most other investments, SIP investments have trumped lump sum investment. Experts attribute the better returns from SIP investing to high volatility.
Says Vinit Sambre, vice-president and fund manager, DSP BlackRock Investment Managers: “Since the financial crisis of 2008, the equity markets have witnessed many bouts of volatility. This volatility, which affects equity investors and causes them agony, has proved a boon over the longer term for those who have used the SIP route. Those who don’t stop their SIPs when markets decline are usually rewarded with handsome returns over the long term.”
Another fact that the comparison of trailing and SIP returns throws up is that more volatile fund categories like mid-cap and small-cap funds benefit more from SIP investing.
Over most investment horizons, SIP returns of mid- and small-cap funds have been higher than their trailing returns.
“Being volatile in nature, these funds fall sharply, allowing SIP investors to average down their cost of purchase,” says Vidya Bala, head of research, Fundsindia.com.
Don’t ignore lump sum completely
Investing through SIPs does not mean that investors should avoid the lump sum route entirely.
When the markets fall steeply, savvy investors can take advantage by putting in additional lump sum in the same funds in which they invest via SIPs.
Also remember while mid-cap and small-cap categories have given higher returns in the past, they are very volatile.
“Investors should have only a limited exposure of 20-30 per cent of their equity portfolio to these funds," says Bala.
Investors should avoid making lump sum investments over a short to medium-term horizon of three-five years. However, do not jettison a fund in haste.
“Don’t redeem a fund if there is short-term underperformance. Markets and fund managers both tend to go through lean phases,” says Kaustubh Belapurkar, director-manager research, Morningstar Investment Advisor India.
But, if a fund lags its benchmark or category average consistently over a year or more, get rid of it.
Diversify the portfolio
To reduce volatility, have a mix of equity and debt funds in most portfolios. PPF offers an interest rate of 8.1 per cent.
Returns from PPF are tax-free and you also enjoy the benefit of Section 80C tax deduction.
“PPF is suited for investors who have a long investment horizon and low need for intermediate liquidity,” says Anil Rego, chief executive officer, Right Horizons. Its interest rate is, however, subject to revision every quarter (unlike in the NSC, where it is fixed).
Another favourite of conservative investors is the bank fixed deposit.
While fixed deposits are simple, safe and liquid, interest rates on them have been declining.
Five years ago, you could have earned 9.55-10.50 per cent on the one-year deposit; today, this rate has come down to around 7.25-8 per cent.
Investors relying on them run the reinvestment risk: When your FD matures, you may have to reinvest it at a lower rate.
“FDs are also tax-inefficient for those in the highest tax bracket,” says Rego.
Finally, gold acts as a good portfolio diversifier since it has low or negative correlation with equities. But, it tends to be volatile.
Limit your investment in it to eight to 10 per cent. By investing in sovereign gold bonds, you can earn 2.75 per cent on your initial investment.
