Anita Nair, 45, an artist, recently purchased a unit-linked plan from a private insurance company. The agent had told her it would be a five-year term.
After she paid the premium and signed the proposal form, she realised it was a 10-year policy term and, immediately, sent a mail of complaint to the company. She was not only refunded the money; the agent was also reprimanded.
Mis-selling is now being taken seriously by life insurers and they're taking innovative steps to reduce this practice.
Max Life Insurance, for example, has put into place a series of measures, including training of agents, a welcome call to the customer and having a fact-finder process with the customer to understand the latter's needs.
Ashish Vohra, senior director and chief distribution officer of Max Life, says they have a process called 'mystery shopping' in place.
In this procedure, external institutions are appointed by the company to randomly call agents and pose as a customer, to ensure they follow the correct procedure for selling a policy.
"Post introduction of these measures, customer complaints have significantly come down, implying mis-selling has been reduced," said Vohra.
Need-based selling is also becoming a focus among companies. Birla Sun Life Insurance has, among the pre-sales initiatives, a process called a 'Pre-issuance verification call'.
It is made by the customer service team as soon as the advisor logs the policy at the nearest branch. This call to the customer is to ensure he/she has understood the policy details, verify his/her credentials and confirm other formal notifications.
"Although recently launched, we expect this particular initiative will ensure there is reduction in first-year