![]() | « Back to article | Print this article |
As an investor, treat hostile takeovers like a normal M&A deal and then decide whether to stay invested Investors of Sudhir Reddy-promoted IVRCL would be happy.
In the past month, when the Essel Group started picking up shares of the company, IVRCL's stock has risen 31 per cent, a rare feat in a market where infrastructure stocks have been suffering due to slow movement in projects and high interest burden.
What makes IVRCL's case more interesting is that the promoter holds only 11.18 per cent, less than Essel's holdings at 12.27 per cent.
No wonder there has been a lot of discussion, even allegations, that Essel is mounting a hostile takeover.
Some analysts have even predicted an open offer soon.
The investor is not directly impacted by a hostile takeover, but needs to decide some things.
First, though, he or she should not get hassled by the 'hostile' word.
He should simply look at it like a normal merger and acquisition deal.
After that, decide whether to exit by booking profits (or cut losses if the shares were bought recently) if the share prices go up sharply, or hold on to the shares?
The first decision depends on the company mounting a takeover.
If it has strong credentials, it would be good for the target company.
So, share prices may continue to do well after the event.
Says a senior analyst, "A takeover is executed so that it becomes a valuable