Rajdeep Endow, Managing Director, India & Global Delivery Lead
In the case of direct taxes:
1. Reduction in corporate tax rate: In view of the fact that the present Budget is expected to be intermediate in nature, insofar as it would pave the way forward for DTC, it will be commendable if CTR in FY 2012-13 is brought down at least to match the proposed rate of flat 30 per cent in the DTC.
2. Stable MAT rate: When the industry was expecting a roll back in MAT levy in the last Union Budget, there was in fact a net increase of 0.08 per cent in the MAT rate. This year, it should be kept steady. Also, MAT should be rationalised it should not exceed 50 per cent of the basic corporate tax rate. Increase in MAT negatively hits the cash flow of companies liable to pay taxes under MAT - there is financial loss on account of time value of money. Also, with the difference between the corporate tax and MAT now getting narrower, new entrepreneurs and startups are bound to find it all the more difficult to compete against established businesses.
3. Exemption to SEZ units from MAT provisions: In the last Budget, units operating in SEZs were brought within the ambit of MAT. FM should re-consider the change and relieve SEZ units from MAT provisions in this Budget.
4. Availability of MAT credit on amalgamation: at present, there is no express provision enabling availability of MAT credit of Transferor Company to Transferee Company in case of an amalgamation. Section 115JB should be amended to allow such carry forward.
5. Extension of advance ruling scheme for resident companies: this will help resident companies to sidestep ambiguity and circumvent hardship of paying taxes in case of different interpretation of law by them.
6. Re-opening of assessments: Appropriate provisions should be established for any re-opening of assessment and the period of re-opening should also be reduced to 2-3 years from the end of Assessment Year.
7. Timeline should be specified for Assessing Officer to pass appeal effect order: to give effect to order of higher appellate authorities, including relevant refunds.
8. Stipulation to Section 206AA (requirement of furnishing PAN) should be introduced: to the effect that this Section shall not be applicable in respect of persons who are not required to obtain PAN u/sec 139A.
9. Provisions to desist Assessing Officer from instigation of penalty proceedings in every assessment order: in the absence of any concealment of facts or 'mens rea', should be introduced.
10. Transfer pricing litigations: Frivolous litigation in transfer pricing needs to be brought to