September 2, 2002
On August 31, the government announced a Rs 14,561-crore (Rs 145.61 billion) restructuring package for the Unit Trust of India, India's oldest and largest mutual fund.
This massive bailout comes following the huge redemption pressure faced by the UTI following erroneous investment decisions.
Investors were shocked by the July 2001 freeze when the UTI suspended the sale and repurchase of its popular Unit Scheme of 1964 (US-64), soon after which the then UTI chairman P S Subramanyam was taken into custody by the Central Bureau of Investigation.
The blame game had begun. The stock markets began to crash and the investors panicked. Under tremendous pressure, the government decided to bail out the UTI.
But this is not the first time the UTI has been bailed out. The last bailout, in 1998, when the government forked out over Rs 3,000 crore (Rs 30 billion), was an abject failure.
The new bailout will certainly curtail fears of huge stock selling by UTI and perk up the capital markets. And the tax incentives may encourage US-64 unit-holders to remain invested in the scheme.
Will this bailout be any better that the previous ones? Should the government continue bailing out institutions like the UTI by using taxpayers' money?
Your views:
. 'It's a Criminal Waste of Taxpayers' Money'
Is Ram Naik
Guilty?
An agitated opposition is demanding the resignation of Petroleum Minister Ram Naik and an inquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation into the reported allotment of petrol pumps to ruling party functionaries in different parts of the country.
The government, in turn, has cancelled all allotments made after January 2000, and released the names of various opposition leaders including Congress politician Manmohan Singh and vice-presidential candidate Sushil Kumar Shinde, who reportedly made recommendations to Ram Naik for such allotments.
But describing this as a "methodology of mudslinging" and a "dirty and diversionary ploy," the opposition continues to demand that Ram Naik assume responsibility and step down.
Should he?
Your views:
. 'Did Modi Resign? Did Fernandes?'
. 'Two Wrongs Don't Make a Right'
. 'Why Single out Ram Naik? What about the others?'
. 'Resignation will not clear the rot'
Disclaimer