Advertisement

Help
You are here: Rediff Home » India » Business » Budget 2008-09 » Special » Features
Search:  Rediff.com The Web
Advertisement
  Discuss this Article   |      Email this Article   |      Print this Article

How demerging has made them richer than ever
Shobhana Subramanian in Mumbai
 
 · My Portfolio  · Live market report  · MF Selector  · Broker tips
Get Business updates:What's this?
Advertisement
February 18, 2008

Cashing in on a booming stock market over the last couple of years, promoters of Indian companies have been busy unlocking value from their businesses. As a result, they have become wealthier by demerging assets or divisions or even just transferring licences.

Consider this: had Reliance Petroleum's [Get Quote] refinery been set up within Reliance Industries [Get Quote], the stakeholders may not have enjoyed the market capitalisation of Rs 75,465 crore (Rs 754.65 billion) that the former commands.

Again, the market capitalisation of Reliance Power, which is yet to implement a single power project, is Rs 86,935 crore (Rs 869.35 billion), whereas that of Reliance Energy [Get Quote] is less than half of that at Rs 40,437 crore (Rs 404.37 billion).

Hiving off businesses into separate companies has paid off handsomely. Bharti Infratel, the tower company of Bharti Airtel [Get Quote], is estimated to have an equity value of Rs 55,000 crore (Rs 550 billion), which should be unlocked soon.

By spinning off its towers into a new company and bringing in new shareholders, Bharti will add to its existing market capitalisation of Rs 1,67,000 crore (Rs 1,670 billion).

Similarly, Reliance Telecom Infrastructure, which houses the towers of Reliance Communications [Get Quote], has been valued by private equity investors at nearly Rs 27,000 crore (Rs 270 billion).

Others are also getting into the act -- ITC is looking to spin off its hotels business while Pantaloon [Get Quote] Retail wants to hive off Big Bazaar and Food Bazaar.

"It's a cyclical phenomenon linked to valuations in the stock markets. Typically conglomerates tend to attract lower multiples than a single product or service company. Therefore, in a good market, companies are keen to hive off businesses," said Arvind Mahajan, executive director of KPMG.

VALUE SPLITS
COMPANY

ASSETS SPUN OFF

Reliance EnergyPower projects 
Bharti Airtel,VodafoneTowers 
Reliance CommunicationsTowers 
Hinduja TMT [Get Quote]IT and ITeS business 
Indiabulls Financial Services [Get Quote]Real estate undertaking 
Sun Pharma [Get Quote]Innovative R&D division 
CamlinChemicals division 
GTLInfrastructure unit 
GE ShippingOffshore services business 
ZeeRegional channels and cable 
GMR Industries [Get Quote]Ferro alloys 
Silverline Technologies [Get Quote]Animation business 
Media Video [Get Quote]Real estate division 
Solectron Centum Electronics [Get Quote]Electronic manufacturing 
services business

Minority shareholders also gain in the process. As Shriram Iyer, head of research at Edelweiss, said: "The benefits of a greater focus to each of the businesses do get reflected in the market. The maximum value though is typically created when the demerged businesses get listed."

The combined market capitalisation of Sun Pharma and its demerged R&D firm SPARC has been 10 to 15 per cent higher than the market capitalization of Sun Pharma since SPARC listed in July 2007.

Shareholders of the erstwhile Zee Telefilms who got shares in Zee News [Get Quote] and WWIL, too, are gainers.

Data on the Bombay Stock Exchange website suggest at least two demerger proposals a month over the last two years. In the case of firms such as GE Shipping, which demerged its offshore service businesses, the value of shares in the two companies is about 70 per cent more than the value of GE Shipping at the time of the spin-off.

Shareholders of Camlin, which spun off its fine chemicals division, too have seen an appreciation of about 35 per cent in this period.

 "When the environment is not good, companies tend to consolidate so that one business can be hedged against the other and losses can be offset against profits. However, in good times companies do not mind incurring higher expenses on two separate firms. The resultant increase in value created far outweighs the increase in costs of running two operations," explained Sanjeev Krishan, executive director, PriceWaterhouseCoopers.



Powered by

More Specials
 Email this Article      Print this Article

© 2008 Rediff.com India Limited. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer | Feedback