Big push to get on line, en masse
Financial Times, (Mark Nicholson in New Delhi), June 2, 1999
Nearly one million Indians already use the internet. Studies estimate that by 2001,
about five million will be surfing the net
Just over a year ago, before India's Bharatiya Janata Party-led government ended
the state monopoly on internet provision, the country had perhaps 130,000 net
subscribers. By the end of next year, industry studies suggest, 1.5m Indians will be
hooked up to the internet. Within two years, the figure could rise to 5m.
Almost one million Indians make use the the internet already, according to some
industry studies, through shared subscriptions. For an increasing number of India's
wealthier urban citizens, the internet is already an established part of life, and the
influence of the internet in the media, among educated Indians and in the daily
dealings of the government, is disproportionately large for a country which still has
only two telephones, for every 100 citizens.
Government policies or statements are now routinely issued on the internet - some,
like India's revised telecoms policy, have been exclusively posted on the net. All
Indian national newspapers have well developed web sites, as do many smaller
regional papers. And the content industry is charging ahead, led by companies such
as Rediff, which is perhaps India's leading portal, India World and Satyam Infoway,
the country's pioneering private ISP - which has signed up 50,000 subscribers alone
since its launch in December last year.
One enterprising grocer in New Delhi is even offering home delivery vegetable sales
over the internet - among the more modest examples of India's nascent e-commerce
industry.
India's internet liberalisation policy is, indeed, among few areas of reform which has
garnered near unanimous praise from the private sector. Driven by a strong and
cohesive lobby from India's flourishing software Industry, rather than consumer
demand, the government's move last Novermber to end the monopoly of VSNL, the
state-run international telecoms provider, met virtually all the industry's demands.
The government placed no restrictions on the number of licences for internet service
providers, charged only a Rs1 peppercorn fee for the 15-year licences, made no
conditions of eligibility on applying companies and allowed 49 per cent foreign equity
investment in any new ISP.
Most radically, however, the government allowed, in principle, for all ISPs to offer
both direct telecom connections to users and international gateway access -
provisions which directly challenged the state providers of basic telecoms services
and, in the case of VSNL, its state monopoly on international telecoms connections.
So far, almost 130 private licences have been issued by the department of
telecommunications (DOT), the government Ministry and Licencing Authority. Most
of these are city-wide or state-based operators, with just three companies currently
offering India-wide services: Satyam Infoway, Dishnet and Bharti-BT, a joint venture
between the Indian private telecoms operator and British Telecom.
And most operators appear broadly content with both the policy and its
implementation so far. However, there is one particular and regularly cited grouse.
"In most cases the government's implementation has been the spirit of the policy,"
says R. Ramaraj, managing director of Satyam Inforway and president of Internet
Service Providers' Association of India. "But there are a couple of instances where
there are problems. The most glaring is in the guidelines for offering companies an
international gateway."
So far, the DOT has failed to provide the guidelines which would set the framework
for private companies to offer their own international telecoms access, free of
VSNL, upon the capacity of which all ISPs otherwise depend. Half a dozen of the
new ISPs have applied for such access, but so far there has been no movement in
allowing private gateways.
The delay appears partly bureaucratic, and partly a result of resistance to a move
which might severely challenge the lucrative international telephone monopoly
enjoyed by VSNL Internet telephony is formally banned under India's Internet
policy, but few government officials or industry players have many illusions about the
effectiveness of the ban or any ability to police it.
The chief consequence of the delay in offering such gateways is, according to
Dewang Mehta, president of the National Association of Software and Service
Companies, the industry lobby, to impede the growth of India's currently modest
electronic-commerce sector, Nasscom estimates that intra-Indian retail e-commerce
was last year worth just Rs. 280m ($6.5m), a modest figure, partly because so few
Indians possess credit cards.
Mr. Mehta believes business-to-business e-commerce is perhaps worth Rs. 1.5bn,
and suggests retail e-commerce might rise by about 200 per cent during the current
year from its small base. Free up international gateway access, however, and he
foresees a mini-boom. "If the gateway approval comes, I could easily predict growth
of 1,000 per cent," he says.