Rediff.com« Back to articlePrint this article

7 lessons you can learn from AAP's failure!

Last updated on: May 22, 2014 18:40 IST
A supporter of Aam Aadmi (Common Man) Party (AAP) stands in front of Indian policemen on guard during a protest outside the headquarters of India's main opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in New Delhi March 5, 2014. The writing on the caps reads I am a common man.

The Aam Aadmi Party's recent debacle tell us why just good intentions are not enough to succeed.

The elections are over and the Bharatiya Janata Party has had a decisive victory. But the Aam Aadmi Party that started out with a lot of promise, lost by a huge margin in most of the seats it contested.

Post elections -- it won just four seats -- there was no mention of AAP in the online/offline media as if it never existed in the first place.

We tried to find what went wrong with AAP despite good intentions, a great army of volunteers, and a brilliant strategy.

In many ways, the AAP's story is similar to a start-up story, and there are lessons to be learnt from the AAP debacle.

1. Do not be overconfident of taking on the biggies

Though taking on Narendra Modi in Varanasi generated a lot of media attention, it was a mistake in retrospect.

While Modi is a seasoned player, the move backfired as the AAP was short on resources and it was a relatively new market for AAP to prove itself.

Calling your start-up a Google killer can give you some attention but it will take a lot of effort to actually kill Google.

Big corporations take time to grow and nurture themselves. One or two years is a very short time for someone to grow big enough to kill a big competition.

Please click NEXT to continue reading...

 

2. Don't scale without resources

Last updated on: May 22, 2014 18:40 IST
Lack of resources to take on experienced players definitely worked against the party.

It is no big secret that the AAP did not have money in its kitty, and there is only so much that social media can do.

Unlike in the US where social media played a huge role in the re-election of President Barack Obama, we must take note that these markets are very different and internet penetration is not as high as we would like to imagine in India.

When it comes to other resources like the number of volunteers, the AAP simply was not as equipped as the people they were competing with.

Which brings us to our second lesson -- unless you have good resources you cannot have enough bandwidth to scale and reach your competitor.

Please click NEXT to continue reading...

3. Don't be everywhere all at once

Last updated on: May 22, 2014 18:40 IST
The AAP's decision to focus on more than one area fell flat on its face.

Ask any seasoned entrepreneur and he will tell you to focus on one area.

The AAP had already won in Delhi. Instead of consolidating this victory, the party gave it up in the hope of a bigger win nationwide.

As a start-up when we are entering a new market, we need to work from scratch and build our base in that area before we can think of expanding.

One formula does not fit everywhere.

Many times we try to incorporate different features in our product and we lose sight of the core problem which our product was slated to address.

Please click NEXT to continue reading...

4. Addressing angry customers

Last updated on: May 22, 2014 18:40 IST
Kejriwal's election campaign was disrupted by angry citizens who threw ink at the leader and his party members.

It is always said an angry customer-turned-happy customer does more marketing for your product than anybody else can. They become your evangelists for life.

Leaving Delhi seemed like a good prospect in order to gain public trust and show the party's integrity, but it backfired badly and made a lot of supporters skeptical and angry too.

Delhi was a missed opportunity.

As a start-up, the AAP did badly in their customer service department and also failed to effectively communicate why they were giving up Delhi.

A great lesson to learn from this is to treat each angry customer as an opportunity for word of mouth PR and wait for them to do wonders of you. 

Please click NEXT to continue reading...

5. Retention was given a lower priority than new user acquisition

Last updated on: May 22, 2014 18:40 IST
Kejriwal's decision to quit Delhi and contest the LS polls upset his followers in Delhi.

Over 80 per cent of the revenues in a start-up come from few big clients who are generally the lifeblood of your existence. Lose them and you crash.

Unfortunately, in order to grow fast, the AAP paid more attention to acquiring new users but the old loyalists were completely ignored.

Some grew skeptical of the big claims and others ditched them.

We do not mean to say that one should ignore acquiring new users, after all they are the key to your growth, but make sure you do not lose those big existing accounts when chasing the new ones.

Please click NEXT to continue reading...

6. The home ground advantage

Last updated on: May 22, 2014 18:40 IST
Perhaps it was a bad idea to have Kumar Vishwas contest from Amethi which was not his home ground.

When it came to Amethi, Rahul Gandhi always had a huge advantage as it was his home ground.

Chances of winning would have been higher for AAP candidate Kumar Vishwas had he contested from Haryana/Delhi since his popularity was already high in those places.

Starting up in a local market is always beneficial as we understand that place better.

Moving to other places works only when we have significant experience at one place and enough resources to beat the competition.

Please click NEXT to continue reading...

7. Communication gap

Last updated on: May 22, 2014 18:40 IST
The people of India did not have a clear understanding of the AAP's intent and purpose of decisions.

A big reason for AAP’s failure was the fact that their intent was not communicated properly, especially after they quit the Delhi government in just 49 days.

Some said they were hungry for power, while others said they could not be trusted.

This is often the case with many first-time founders when they are pitching; a small communication gap can make you sound ambiguous or make the investors skeptical about your offering and your ability to deliver.

Have a clear cut reason behind every decision you make and convey them to your team in a very effective manner.

Whether the AAP learns from its past mistakes, we are yet to see.

However, we hope you do not make the above mistakes when your start-up is just about gathering steam.