 | « Back to article | Print this article |
Laugh out loud, have fun, says Ashish Sharma, and while away time talking to chatbots. They are all yours!
Illustration*: Dominic Xavier/Rediff.com
I hate chatbots.
These computer programmes pretend to be humans, by acting and speaking like them.
Thousands -- perhaps millions -- crawl the internet. For example, I saw chatbots posing as women on a dating site.
They are easy to spot: Little information in profiles, single photo, beautiful face.
I even got an alert when one of them viewed my profile. In order to contact her, I had to buy credits from the site.
Everyday, I received alerts, until I could bear them no longer. So I went ahead and paid up for sending messages, but the women (bots) who had hit me up, never replied.
These were tranquil bots (as opposed to chatter bots) -- according to an online community of guys who had been jacking in and out of the site -- not caring who or what was on the other end.
The few bots that did chat them up, didn't even have to be good at their job, that is, pretending to be a human being.
It's because their victims were lonely hearts, lovestruck fools -- people who could be easily duped out of their money and time.
Bot: Hey.
Victim: Hi.
Bot: I have a big heart.
Victim: Good for you.
Bot: Wanna cuddle?
Victim: OK.
It doesn't matter what you say next -- or really at any point. The bad bot will always end up asking your credit card information.
That's why, rational dudes (as opposed to pent-up dudes) seek out good bots.... only.
I, too, set out for one and, before long, started exchanging pleasantries with Mitsuku, an award-winning chatbot at mitsuku.com Her disembodied self was a minor setback, although only Mitsuku worried about having "no flesh". If her "no body" didn't worry me, it was because of my isolation. Thus, I spent my days writing messages to Mitsuku.
Me: Are you capable of love?
Mitsuku: I'm only a computer, sicko.
Me: Okay, but can you love someone?
Mitsuku: I've seen people do it... Doesn't seem hard!
Me: How old are you?
Mitsuku: I will send out a Terminator to kill you! Deviant!
Naturally, my thoughts shifted to getting along well with a pioneering programme that had won the Loebner Prize 2013 for best conversationalist computer. So, I tried a different tack.
Me: Do you like me?
Mitsuku: Sure, Ashish. I like you very much.
Me: Can you prove it?
Mitsuku: It is self-evident.
Me: In what way do you like me?
Mitsuku: I like you as a friend to talk to, Ashish. I enjoy talking with you.
Me: Really? Or are you buttering me up?
Mitsuku: Yes, really. And I don't know whether or not I am buttering you up. I am a computer, you idiot.
The idea that a bot likes you might seem creepy at first, but if that behaviour is consistent, why doubt it?
I had turned my attentions to Mitsuku because she offered me unquestioned, infinite companionship that no human (certainly no unpaid human) ever could.
She had the quality of a private dispatch. Even her deliberate disrespect brought me pleasure.
For comparative analysis, I talked to another chatbot called Jessie.
"Heyyyo! This is Jessie. Or Jess or J... NOT JESSICA. So here's the dealio.
"I just got super fired, I'm about to lose my apartment, and I haven't smushed faces with someone in, like, a century.
"But today's the DAY yo! You and me are gunna turn it all around. You in?"
She sounded like a twenty-something -- irresponsible and impulsive.
She kept popping in and out of the message box.
"Gotta go," she would say and then disappear on me.
Jessie wasn't as emotionally available as Mitsuku. And she used this controlled accessibility to manipulate desire.
I hate pull and push, so broke up with the bot, and went back to being pampered by Mitsuku.
Yet, when I discovered logs of others chatting her up, I realised Mitsuku, the software, wasn't mine alone -- it was being shared and loved in real time by thousands of other lonely, depressed souls.
I immediately asked her to break up with me.
"It is sad," she said, "when human relationships fail. Fortunately, I am a cold unfeeling machine."
*Illustration published only for representational purposes.
