The final ranking
How the rankings work?
Test Updates:
July 3, 2002
June 18, 2002
June 4, 2002
May 16, 2002
Apr 5, 2002
Mar 20, 2002
Mar 14, 2002
Mar 4, 2002
Feb 12, 2002
Jan 18, 2002
Jan 11, 2002
Dec 23, 2001
Dec 5, 2001
Nov 30, 2001
ODI Updates:
July 3, 2002
June 18, 2002
June 3, 2002
May 16, 2002
Apr 25, 2002
Apr 10, 2002
Mar 20, 2002
Mar 5, 2002
Feb 20, 2002
Feb 9, 2002
Feb 5, 2002
Jan 14, 2002
|
July 15, 2002
India climbing rapidlyM J
Manohar Rao and Srinivas Bhogle
Till the 3-1 one-day series win against West Indies, India seemed incapable
of going past the 40-point mark in the Rediff ODI ratings. The win in West
Indies took India to 40.81 and Saturday night's win in the NatWest final takes
India to an incredible high of 44.45. It isn't easy to climb so swiftly in the
ratings; India is currently playing magical one-day cricket.
India have gained more by defeating Sri Lanka so convincingly. Before the
NatWest series began, Sri Lanka were sitting pretty at the third place. But
losses to India and England, and Pakistan's 2-1 win against Australia in
Australia, have pushed the Sri Lankans down badly. SL (50.53) are still fourth;
but they are now being seriously challenged by their Asian rivals: Pakistan
(53.20) have already overtaken them to the third place and the amazing Indians
(44.45) aren't too far behind.
The current (as on Jul 14, 2002) scorecard for the major ODI playing teams is
shown in Table A.
TABLE A: ODI SCORE CARD (as on Jul
14, 2002) |
|
|
Aus |
Eng |
Ind |
NZ |
Pak |
RSA |
SL |
WI |
Zim |
|
Australia |
H A
N
|
|
6 / 8 3 /
6 0 / 1
|
4 / 4 4 /
8 0 / 1
|
1 / 5 6 /
7 0 / 1
|
6 / 9 5 /
6 2 / 3
|
4.5/7 5.5 / 7 1.5 /
2
|
4 / 5 3 / 6 0 /
1
|
7/ 7 3.5 / 7 1 /
1
|
4 / 4 3 / 3 1 /
1
|
England |
H A
N
|
3 / 6 2 /
8 1 / 1
|
|
3.5 / 6 3 /
7 0 / 2
|
2 / 3 2 / 6 0 /
1
|
2 / 6 1 /
4 1 / 2
|
1 / 4 2 / 11 0 /
1
|
3 / 4 0 /
3 3 / 5
|
3 / 5 1 /
5 2 / 2
|
3 / 4 5 /
5 1 / 2
|
India |
H A
N
|
4 / 8 0 /
4 1 / 1
|
4 / 7 2.5 /
6 2 / 2
|
|
4 / 6 2 /
5 1 / 3
|
1 / 9 1 /
3 0 / 1
|
4 / 9 3 / 11 1 /
1
|
3 / 4 2 /
7 3 / 3
|
5 / 6 2 /
3 2 / 3
|
5 / 7 4 /
5 2 / 2
|
New
Zealand |
H A
N
|
1 / 7 4 /
5 1 / 1
|
4 / 6 1 / 3 1 /
1
|
3 / 5 2 /
6 2 / 3
|
|
3 / 7 0 /
4 0 / 2
|
3 / 6 0 /
7 1 / 6
|
2 / 6 0 /
5 1 / 2
|
6 / 6 1 /
4 0 / 1
|
2 / 4 1 /
3 1 / 1
|
Pakistan |
H A
N
|
3 / 9 1 /
6 1 / 3
|
3 / 4 4 /
6 1 / 2
|
2 / 3 8 /
9 1 / 1
|
4 / 4 4 /
7 2 / 2
|
|
0 / 1 0 /
4 1 / 2
|
0 / 4 4 /
7 1 / 3
|
1.5 / 4 4.5/10 2 /
3
|
2 / 3 2 /
2 2 / 2
|
South
Africa |
H A
N
|
1.5 / 7 2.5/7 0.5 /
2
|
9 / 11 3 / 4 1 /
1
|
8 / 11 5 / 9 0 /
1
|
7 / 7 3 /
6 5 / 6
|
4 / 4 1 /
1 1 / 2
|
|
7 / 9 1 /
5 1 / 1
|
8 / 10 5 / 7 1 /
1
|
2 / 3 3 /
3 1 / 1
|
Sri
Lanka |
H A
N
|
3 / 6 1 /
5 1 / 1
|
3 / 3 1 /
4 2 / 5
|
5 / 7 1 /
4 0 / 3
|
5 / 5 4 /
6 1 / 2
|
3 / 7 4 /
4 2 / 3
|
4 / 5 2 /
9 0 / 1
|
|
3 / 5 0 /
1 1 / 1
|
5 / 5 3 /
4 2 / 2
|
West
Indies |
H A
N
|
3.5 / 7 0 / 7 0 /
1
|
4 / 5 2 /
5 0 / 2
|
1 / 3 1 /
6 1 / 3
|
3 / 4 0 /
6 1 / 1
|
5.5/10 2.5 / 4 1 /
3
|
2 / 7 2 / 10 0 /
1
|
1 / 1 2 / 5
0 / 1
|
|
2 / 2 2 /
2 1 / 2
|
Zimbabwe |
H A
N
|
0 / 3 0 /
4 0 / 1
|
0 / 5 1 /
4 1 / 2
|
1 / 5 2 /
7 0 / 2
|
2 / 3 2 /
4 0 / 1
|
0 / 2 1 /
3 0 / 2
|
0 / 3 1 /
3 0 / 1
|
1 / 4 0 /
5 0 / 2
|
0 / 2 0 /
2 1 / 2
|
|
The current ODI rankings are shown in Table F, below.
TABLE
F: FINAL ODI RANKINGS (as on Jul 14,
2002) |
Country |
Performance index
(RBI) |
Difference 28.6.02 to
14.7.02 |
Rank |
Australia |
69.31 |
-0.02 |
1 |
South Africa |
60.43 |
-0.24 |
2 |
Pakistan |
53.20 |
-0.06 |
3 |
Sri Lanka |
50.53 |
-3.96 |
4 |
India |
44.45 |
+3.53 |
5 |
England |
37.73 |
-0.92 |
6 |
New Zealand |
37.05 |
+0.41 |
7 |
West Indies |
35.97 |
+0.33 |
8 |
Zimbabwe |
15.80 |
+0.00 |
9 |
We are currently making a careful review of our procedure to calculate the
Rediff ODI ratings. More specifically, we are considering how to give a higher
weightage to wins in tournament finals. We hope to be ready with this procedure
before the ICC Champions Trophy starts in Sri Lanka in September 2002. We don't
expect things to change too much -- they shouldn't, because the ratings are
already doing very well. Just as an example, our new proposed procedure would
probably have taken India closer to 45, instead of 44.45, after Saturday's
famous victory.
M J Manohar Rao is professor and director, Department of Economics,
University of Mumbai, Mumbai; Srinivas Bhogle is scientist and head, Information
Management Division, National Aerospace Laboratories, Bangalore.
Back to top
Design: Imran Shaikh
|