A day at the circus
Harish Chandramouli
After the pulsating effects of the recently concluded Test series, I swore to myself I would have absolutely nothing
to do with the one-dayers that were to follow. I reasoned
that to sit and watch limited-overs cricket after such an
outstanding exhibition of the longer form of the game,
would be akin to mocking all that the game really stood for.
However, in the end, the bait was just too much to miss out
on. When a friend spoke to me on Saturday and suggested that
I come over not only for the Bangalore tie, but that I also
come early so that I could first wade through recordings of
both the final day of the third Indo-Aus Test and the second
WI-SA Test first, I was taken in hook, line and sinker.
After spending all night watching the rejuvenated Carl Hooper
bat quite brilliantly on that last day against the Proteas
(sadly, unable to lead his team to victory in the end), it was
finally show time at the Chinnaswamy stadium for the real fun
and games.
I don't know what I had expected, or what my mind had
readied itself for, but at the very sight of the two teams
adorned in those ridiculous coloured flannels striding
out onto the ground, the absurdity of the whole event was
reinforced like never before. One-day cricket was just not
serious cricket. Test cricket was where it was at, and
where it would always be.
The first few overs that went by seemed to only further
underline that the players too exactly thought this. Both
sides almost seemed to be making an effort to try and
prove that they cared 'less' about this contest than the
other. But in the end, this was one area where Australia
did score a brief victory over India. After some gentle
pushing and prodding around, the fall of the first Indian
wicket seemed to set off an alarm in Tendulkar's head,
and all of a sudden he became a possessed man.
This was the Sachin we had all been dying to see for so
long - the one who batted virtually without a care on his
shoulders, and one who just went out there and gave it a
thump without any inhibition at all - and boy was it fun
while it lasted. Unfortunately, though, just when he was
beginning to blossom and really take the opposition to
the cleaners, a cruel twist of fate denied him and us the
opportunity of really seeing a protracted effort.
Poor Laxman seemed an absolutely shattered soul after the
event -- the enormity of the transgression he had helped
commit, as well as the sight of a furious Tendulkar storming
back into the pavilion without even bothering to heed his
half-hearted attempt at an apology was enough to wipe out
the smile on his face for the rest of his innings -- and
almost as if in a bid to match the man who was on his way
back stroke for stroke, he set about blazing away at one
end till he ultimately perished, trying for far too much.
Even though it is very hard to take these one-day games
seriously, they do serve a purpose in the talent they
unearth. Having read the day before that either Dinesh Mongia
or Virender Sehwag might be playing in place of Robin Singh,
I was naturally pleased to find that the second of the two
had indeed been pencilled in for the tie.
I was pleased not just because I had followed his exploits
on the Ranji scene in recent times (in particular, his
ability to score extremely quickly, even when under pressure)
but because as someone who had been suggesting ever since
the advent of the Stone Age that India needed at least SIX
top order batsmen if they were to become competitive against
the top teams, the exclusion of a bits and pieces cricketer
like Robin Singh was indeed a sign that things were moving
along in the right direction.
And today, Sehwag showed exactly why India had erred all
these years, in not giving their young batsmen with talent
a go in the middle-order: coming in at 122/4, rather than
prod and defend his way to an innings that would have resulted
in India still losing handily in the end, he came out and
played with the sort of aggression, vigour and panache that
made it seem as if India had never lost all those wickets to
begin with. The Indian innings, which was starting to look
in tatters, was resurrected beautifully and with minimal fuss.
But if Sehwag impressed me to a certain extent, then Dahiya
took it to an altogether new level. Call it a fluke, call his
innings today a never to be repeated effort, or one that only
came about because of the easy nature of the track -- but it
is still hard to remember when *any* Indian wicket-keeper made
a 38-ball fifty, or played as unselfishly and for the team as
Vijay did.
Those to me were the brief highlights when India batted. And
when Australia took to the crease later on, I really couldn't
care less. I had seen what I had come to see -- some classy
Indian batting, the positive strokeplayer of a fresh face,
and above all, some enterprise and style from even those faces
that were slightly more familiar.
The Indian bowling, as always, was a grim reminder as to just
how little talent we have in a department that is arguably the
most important at all. Apart from the ever improving and
pugnacious Zaheer Khan, the rest were most ordinary. Ajit
Agarkar in particular standing out for an extremely horrifying
spell where he couldn't seem to get a thing right.
Meanwhile, the game continued on. Poor Steve Waugh got sawed
off by a poor decision at a critical time, and from there on
it was always clear that the Australians would extend their
losing streak to the OD format too.
Not that any of it really mattered, however. The Tests 'were' over and done with, and both teams knew which side had prevailed in the contest that actually stood for something.
The final decision of the day said all there was to be said
about the tamasha on the field. The umpire, after looking like
he was going to call a leg bye to one that was clearly missing
legstump, deciding in the end that what the heck, he had had
enough of it all, and ending up raising his finger instead.
The message was clear. Circus time was over. It was time for
the participants to head home.
Editor's note: Rediff believes that like its own editorial staffers, readers too have points of view on the many issues relating to cricket as it is played.
Therefore, Rediff provides in its editorial section space for readers to write in, with their views. The views expressed by the readers are carried as written, in order to preserve the original voice.
However, it needs mentioning that guest columns are opinion pieces, and reflect only the feelings of the individual concerned -- the fact that they are published on Rediff's cricket site does not amount to an endorsement by the editorial staff of the opinions expressed in these columns.