 | « Back to article | Print this article |
Over 25,600 cases of banking fraud reported up to December 21, 2017, says Minister RS Prasad.
Illustration: Dominic Xavier/Rediff.com.
Public sector banks lost a total of Rs 227.43 billion due to banking fraud between 2012 and 2016, notes an IIM-Bangalore study.
Electronics and Information-Technology Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad recently told Parliament, quoting Reserve Bank of India data, there had been over 25,600 cases of banking fraud worth Rs 1.79 billion reported up to December 21, 2017.
Data released by the RBI last March revealed that during the first nine-months of 2016-17, 455 cases of fraudulent transactions of Rs 100,000 and above were detected at ICICI Bank, 429 at State Bank of India, 244 at Standard Chartered Bank and 237 at HDFC Bank.
Data shows 64 employees of State Bank of India, while 49 of HDFC Bank and 35 of Axis Bank were involved in facilitating these transactions.
Between April and December 2016, a total of 3,870 fraudulent cases were reported involving Rs 177.50 billion, which were facilitated by 450 private and public sector employees.
2011
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Fraud likely to hit other lenders too
The fraudulent transactions at Punjab National Bank are likely to hit the books of other lenders as well. Doubts about similar fraudulent practices at other banks were gathering steam, analysts said.
The impact of the PNB fraud will extend to counter parties (lenders), hit their asset qualities and increase provisions for bad loans.
Most bankers said the entire liability would fall on PNB since the letters of understanding (LoUs) availed by Nirav Modi’s companies were issued on behalf of the bank’s Mumbai branch.
Some banks, however, have direct exposure to Nirav Modi’s companies, though they have been standard assets so far.
Bankers said Modi sent LoUs to banks stating that he would square off all his dues and that his company Firestone Diamond was up for sale. The valuation of the company was Rs 105 billion, he claimed in the letter.
But according to a PTI report, the CBI investigation has now expanded to a number of jewellery companies, which could be a cause for concern for banks. The nature of banks’ engagements with jewellery companies was not clear.
"Four big jewellers -- Gitanjali, Ginni, Nakshatra and Nirav Modi -- are under scanner. The CBI and the Enforcement Directorate are looking at their arrangements with various banks and the end use of money," a senior official of a public sector bank told PTI.
Other banks may not have much to worry though.
Allahabad Bank has an exposure of Rs 20-22 billion routed through its Hong Kong branch in the PNB fraud. However, the entire exposure is on the bank, and does not relate to the client, confirmed Usha Ananthasubramanian, CEO, Allahabad Bank.
The bank had overdues slated to be paid on January 25 and subsequently on February 5, which were defaulted. ‘We do have exposure to PNB, but it is on the bank and not on the client. The exposure is roughly Rs 20-22 billion,” Ananthasubramanian told Business Standard.
The bank is contemplating corrective action, including tighter auditing and sensitising employees.
Another Kolkata-based bank, UCO Bank, has a direct exposure of around Rs 280 million to Nirav Modi. The bank also has an indirect exposure to PNB through its Hong Kong branch, confirmed a senior official at the bank.
R K Takkar, managing director and chief executive officer of UCO Bank, could not be reached for comments.
Mumbai-based Dena Bank has a standalone exposure of Rs 50 crore to the Nirav Modi company. It is a standard account with Dena Bank, a senior official said.
“The case assumes significance because based on these transactions other banks had advanced loans to these clients abroad. PNB has also involved the Enforcement Directorate to track the audit trail of the money. This dampens the sentiments around PNB, which had seen a marginal improvement in its asset quality in this quarter," said Jaikishan Parmar, analyst at Angel Broking.
Namrata Acharya and Abhijit Lele
