Why do executives have to be cajoled to attend a training session that is likely to enhance their own employability and help them to perform better at work?, asks Indrajit Gupta.
Is training an anachronism that the business world continues to cling to? You have to wonder about that when you see corporate executives often have to be dragged to attend a training session, kicking and screaming.
A friend who is a corporate trainer says it is a common sight to find training folks on the phone every morning before the session begins dealing with a variety of creative reasons why someone is unable to attend the training session.
That's forced many corporations to adopt military style methods.
I know of quite a few leading organisations in India that deny you promotion and dock your pay if you've chosen to bunk a training session that you've been nominated for.
So what does that tell us about the learning culture at India Inc? Why do executives have to be cajoled to attend a training session that is likely to enhance their own employability and help them to perform better at work?
There's yet another dimension to it: many corporate executives see training as an entitlement.
A director at a leading bank once said that many high performers inside his company were likely to feel slighted if they weren't nominated for an advanced leadership program at a leading US business school, and instead sent to a similar program at a leading Indian business school.
The effectiveness of such leadership programs are questionable.
A large media organisation nominates a batch of senior executives to a customised leadership program designed by a leading business school in India every year.
Talk to most participants who've been through it - and the chances are that they aren't able to tell you with any degree of confidence if the program benefitted them in any real way.
Yet the sausage factory continues to roll on, raising critical questions about the utility of the crores of money being poured into training every year.
I've often wondered if there is a more sensible way to reboot the training model.
Some interesting ideas emerged recently through a conversation with the head of learning at Asian Paints. Here are some pointers to how they look at training: 1.
They've completely disbanded the idea of an annual training calendar. 2. Instead of running a plethora of ritualised training programs, they've cut it down to just six. 3.
They work with their key business units in a disciplined manner to identify key organisational challenges.
The attempt is to drill down as deeply as possible on the key outcomes they'd like to drive that year. 4.
Once the key outcomes are clearly prioritised, they then create problem solving teams that are brought together once a month over a 12 month period to first frame the business problem, brainstorm solutions, build workable prototypes and also supported in multiple ways to achieve their outcomes.
That support could be through knowledge management tools being made available to them or access to cutting edge training resources from around the world.
Either way, the ownership of the business challenge always remains with the business managers.
The learning teams support the initiatives by helping surface the real business outcomes - and providing a buffet of creative options to solve them. 5.
The cookie-cutter programs on honing negotiation skill or communication skills are now passe.
While they fall into the good-to-do list, the new generation of workers are increasingly able to pick up the relevant skills on their own, if you point them to the right set of options available freely on the Internet.
While this is still work-in-progress at Asian Paints, I believe there's a very good chance that the model will work.
After all, it places the accountability of learning back on the business owners. And links it to clear, well-defined business outcomes.
That way, it no longer treats learning as an entitlement - more as a means to an end. In the days to come, the internet will open up new learning opportunities and tools that are likely to disrupt existing solutions.
Yet the winning organisations are those that will take a more problem solving approach to learning, help separate the wheat from the chaff and look to seamlessly integrate the new tools and approaches into their work, not as an appendage as it is today.
Similarly, this shift will demand greater accountability from the training and coaching community as well-be it the business schools, learning networks and business education ventures - to work with organisations to drive business outcomes-or be prepared to be disrupted.
And for corporate executives, the bottom-line is clear: stop thinking about training as a sop and take responsibility for results.
And it's this obsession with problem solving that separates the real smart entrepreneurs from the rest.
Image: For representational purposes only; Photograph: Lucy Nicholson/Reuters
Indrajit Gupta is co-founder and director at Founding Fuel, a new learning platform aimed at the entrepreneurial community.
